A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
It has been a long time since education had important effect on students’ future. To have a better future in career they should enter college. Before entering college they have to pass curriculum in high school. In my opinion, every nation should suggest all of its students to study same national curriculum before they start to study at college.
Studying the same national curriculum at school provides the same situation for students who want to take part in colleges entrance exams. Actually, students all over the country have the same opportunity and facility to compete with each other. For example, students who live in villages and deprived areas have a good chance to become successful in these exams because all the subjects which they have to study for the exams are the same as what other students in rich cities study. On the other hand, the rule of implementing national curriculum all over the nation helps government to identify talented students and invest in them. For instance, in some regions of countries physical education isn’t highlighted and school heads don’t pay attention to it. If nations need all of schools deans to present the same national curriculum to the students, gifted students will be found in every field of study.
However, there are some economic issues which lead to lack of observation by government. In this case, equality in national curriculum will be lost. There isn’t enough money to support schools in some poor regions so they don’t manage national curriculum the same as the wealthy areas. To overcome these problems, government should regulate some strategies which assign budget to manage institutions in underdeveloped regions.
To conclude, the better education situation e.g. national curriculum students have in their schools, the more successful students will be in passing entrance exams of colleges. Also, it is necessary to develop same national curriculum all over the nation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | AlmeeC. | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | lekuleku | 62 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | nikhil40507 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | greuela001 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | vineel | 58 | view |
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 56
- The following appeared as a recommendation by a committee planning a ten-year budget for the city of Calatrava.The birthrate in our city is declining: in fact, last year's birthrate was only one-half that of five years ago. Thus the number of student 63
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 67
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary schools rather than secondary school Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 73
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 149, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Before” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...re in career they should enter college. Before entering college they have to pass curr...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, e.g., however, if, so, for example, for instance, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 14.8657303371 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 33.0505617978 45% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1667.0 2235.4752809 75% => OK
No of words: 314.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30891719745 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71590332625 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 215.323595506 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522292993631 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 704.065955056 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.5365699612 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.1875 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.625 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 5.21951772744 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.516547299622 0.243740707755 212% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.185789143526 0.0831039109588 224% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143856809191 0.0758088955206 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.343665576406 0.150359130593 229% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124030540154 0.0667264976115 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.