In order for any work of art-for example, a film, a novel, a poem, or a song-to have merit, it must be understandable to most people.
It remains to be answered whether art should be easily understood by most people. Although art derives from life and ordinary people, we cannot deny that it is the myth that intrigues numerous people. Consequently, I maintain that it is not necessary for art to be accessible for most people. Artists like poets, composers, directors are supposed to keep doing what they are willing to do instead of catering most people.
Writers, musicians, and painters usually utilize their spirit and their professional skills to perform arts. It is not the popularity among people and the comprehensiveness of arts but the spirits and the meaning of arts that counts. Take a song for example. The success of a song springs from the lyrics and the music other than whether it can be fully understood. The lyrics are like a poem containing limited words, but the meaning can be as far as people can imagine. The song which impresses certain kinds of people can be called a success. On the contrary, if the lyrics of a song is common to every person regardless of age, maybe it doesn’t necessarily have merit, but the attest from most people for it is meaningless.
Besides, what should be in the art depends on the artists in that artists strive to express their own ideas in their arts. Ideas from those artists are of great importance despite the fact that most people will not fully understand what the artists want to show. We should respect those artists for their innovations in arts although sometimes they cannot be accepted. The development of arts is attributed to the uncertainty of these arts. Arts are not like meals, and we shouldn’t arbitrarily equate the merit of arts with whether it can be understood easily by most people.
However, if a certain of art is so difficult to understand, its influence might be decreased a lot. Thus, the merit of it is limited. For instance, if a film is directed without logics and the director is eager to show appallingly different ideas, then the audience will not obtain the whole story. To assess the success of such a film, its unique way to express ideas obscures the audience and exerts detrimental impacts on its future success.
To sum up, we cannot hastily criticize a certain kind of art due to whether it is understandable to most people; on the contrary, the way artists show their ideas and express their spirits and impart their knowledge is the most significant.
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems. 61
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed 58
- It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves. 58
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 473, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ng can be as far as people can imagine. The song which impresses certain kinds of p...
^^^
Line 3, column 683, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...oesn't necessarily have merit, but the attest from most people for it is meaningless....
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, however, if, may, so, then, thus, for example, for instance, kind of, on the contrary, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2023.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 418.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83971291866 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73192857857 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.456937799043 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 617.4 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.0516192631 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.3333333333 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9047619048 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90476190476 5.21951772744 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334557141077 0.243740707755 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111662981638 0.0831039109588 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0868281501507 0.0758088955206 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184120045712 0.150359130593 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0621651231876 0.0667264976115 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 14.1392134831 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.