People's attitudes are determined more by their immediate situation or surroundings than by society as a whole.
People’s attitudes are static towards some matter and dynamic towards some matter. But the determinant of attitude is not restricted to immediate situations, surroundings or society rather it is a combination of current circumstances and one’s own social learning towards a particular topic or matter and I believe the society as a whole influence more than the immediate situation or surroundings in shaping attitude.
No doubt that the present state of a human being has a significant impact on his or her attitude but it is not the prime catalyst. Consider, a boss, in an office as an example; when he or she is in a good mood, might pardon any mistake of his or her employee and the opposite could also happen when the boss is upset or already angry for some reason. In this context, the attitude of the boss towards that particular employee has developed from the instant mental situation of the boss himself or herself. Similarly, it is true for the employee also because the attitude of the boss towards the employee would also determine the employee’s perception of the boss. Hence, it can be said that momentary action can determine one’s attitude towards others.
However, people learn valuable lessons and norms from the society they belong to, and it has a greater impact on developing their attitudes. For example, a person growing up in a liberal society will come to know the benefits of capitalism and it is probable if not obvious that he/she will be a patron of the capitalist economy. On the other hand, a socialist society or a centrally planned economy will have a different impact on their habitants, they will most likely deject capitalism. Moreover, the “attitude” grown from the social structure is less vulnerable to change from momentary influence. That means a socialist cannot be converted to a capitalist overnight. Again a society which promotes peace and cooperation will likely to produce peaceful and patient human beings whereas hate promoting society may supply war-prone generations.
Similarly, people learn daily habits from their society which in turn develop their attitude towards a particular matter. For instance, a vegetarian society, where meat is extremely prohibited, contains an exclusive view of animals. To them, killing animals for eating is a great sin and people from those societies conserve this view anywhere. They may move to any place where eating anything is allowed, however, their movement or joining a new surrounding will not be enough provocative to accept meat because it is a long-held belief from his society.
To sum up, it can be said that people’s attitudes may develop from the current situation but this type of attitude is dynamic and changes frequently. However, it is not the case always, especially when it comes to long-held learning or belief of one’s society and people tend to stick to their social norms and learnings.
- Some people believe that scientific discoveries have given us a much better understanding of the world around us Others believe that science has revealed to us that the world is infinitely more complex than we ever realized 83
- The following is a letter to the head of the tourism bureau on the island of Tria Erosion of beach sand along the shores of Tria Island is a serious threat to our island and our tourist industry In order to stop the erosion we should charge people for usi 64
- The most effective way to understand contemporary culture is to analyze the trends of its youth Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In deve 66
- The charts bleow give information about the electricity generation in two countries in 2009 73
- There is now evidence that the relaxed pace of life in small towns promotes better health and greater longevity than does the hectic pace of life in big cities Businesses in the small town of Leeville report fewer days of sick leave taken by individual wo 68
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, may, moreover, similarly, so, whereas, for example, for instance, no doubt, it is true, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 14.8657303371 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2443.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 480.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08958333333 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68069463864 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80799871275 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483333333333 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 781.2 704.065955056 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.0094128366 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.578947368 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2631578947 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73684210526 5.21951772744 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336327500217 0.243740707755 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0945796113789 0.0831039109588 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100591460044 0.0758088955206 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196606196895 0.150359130593 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109841117803 0.0667264976115 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 100.480337079 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.