As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
In the world of growing technology, the ability of humans to think is slightly deterioating. Many new technologies have burgeoned and making our lives easier. So humans should make use of these technologies to improve their lives and should not be lazy instead.
Earlier back in 15th century, there were not many sources of transportation or communication. One has to depend on horses, boats or other means of transport to travel. There was no means of communication and one should depend on pigeons or letters to forward a message from one place to another. Life was harder and one should toil enough to get their work done. However, due to new inventions in the technology, there are many ways of transporting and communication in the recent times making it easier for mankind. Later in 17th and 18th centuries, because of industrialization many new inventions come into market in making betterment of the world.
Moreover, after the evolution of internet and invention of computers, life became much more easier. Computers and programs could solve many convoluted problems in seconds and thus aided for the growth of IT industry. After the inventions of cell phones communication become much more easier than before, that one can communicate with any part of the world within seconds.
But on the other hand, humans while utilizing these technologies started becoming feckless day by day. In the current world of social medias, even though they are connected through internet there is no personal bonding among them. Due to many of these sumptuous sophestications, the ability of mankind to think and solving real time problems is deterioating. Technology has impacted their lives in such a way that, they are relying even to solve basic problems in life. Because of laziness they are getting obese and leading to many health issues and diseases.
So technology should be used whenever it is required. Technology is a boon to mankind and should not be turned as a bane. Humans differ from other animals in the world only because of their ability to think and that ability should not deteriorate only because of technology. So one should harness their power to think make this world of technology a better place.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | tarun9927 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | pranav_kanth | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | vivek2upad | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | sefeliz | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | jason123 | 54 | view |
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 50
- SuperCorp recently moved its headquarters to Corporateville. The recent surge in the number of homeowners in Corporateville proves that Corporateville is a superior place to live than Middlesburg, the home of SuperCorp's current headquarters. Moreover, Mi 43
- Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated. 50
- Universities should require students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying. 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 88, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...nvention of computers, life became much more easier. Computers and programs could solve man...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 280, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...f cell phones communication become much more easier than before, that one can communicate w...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, second, so, thus, while, as to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1859.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 368.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05163043478 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82985612991 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510869565217 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 584.1 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.6939032658 60.3974514979 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.5238095238 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5238095238 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.21951772744 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169664341423 0.243740707755 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0514233527999 0.0831039109588 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449391465982 0.0758088955206 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100314466487 0.150359130593 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044730458623 0.0667264976115 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.