As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.

In today's modern world, science and technology has developed so much that there exists a scientific solution in the form of a gadget or device for almost every problem, be it daily mundane chores or anything more complex even. As it goes, necessity is the mother of all inventions. Today we have technological solutions for almost every problem we can think of. These developments have made life of the common man much more easier. But to think of this dependence of humans on technology as a bane rather than a boon would be a bit extreme.

The immense progress that has been made in the field of research and development across the world is itself a result of the outstanding ability of humans to think. As more and more path breaking discoveries are being made everyday, it has only led to the quest for an even better and faster technology. From landline phones to huge but portable mobile phones and now to attractive looking cellphones that are conveniently compact and also multipurpose, the human hunger for an even better technology doesn't seem to satiate at anything. The technological developments have not lead to a saturation in thinking abilities of humans but rather motivated them to think out of the box, to do the impossible.

Today, we have automatons that are helping matrons with household jobs. People do not have to worry for petty jobs and instead can devote their time and energy for more fruitful things. If this would have been the case that the technological developments were a hindrance in the human thinking abilities, we would not get to see the news of advancements in almost every field in newspapers everyday.

The advancements in technology have led to a better and comfortable life for every individual. People can now invest their time for more important things and for every problem they face they think for an even better technology to assist them, which leads to even more inventions.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 420, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...s have made life of the common man much more easier. But to think of this dependence of hum...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 223, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...ath breaking discoveries are being made everyday, it has only led to the quest for an ev...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 501, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...an hunger for an even better technology doesnt seem to satiate at anything. The techno...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 577, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'leaded', 'led'.
Suggestion: leaded; led
...The technological developments have not lead to a saturation in thinking abilities o...
^^^^
Line 5, column 95, Rule ID: WORRY_FOR[1]
Message: The verb 'worry' does not normally take the preposition 'for'. Did you mean 'worry about'?
Suggestion: worry about
...h household jobs. People do not have to worry for petty jobs and instead can devote their...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 195, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had been'?
Suggestion: had been
...nergy for more fruitful things. If this would have been the case that the technological develop...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 391, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...nts in almost every field in newspapers everyday. The advancements in technology have...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1610.0 2235.4752809 72% => OK
No of words: 329.0 442.535393258 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89361702128 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7835241624 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 215.323595506 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519756838906 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 704.065955056 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.0914631771 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.64285714286 5.21951772744 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297700456274 0.243740707755 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10723350969 0.0831039109588 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630219259487 0.0758088955206 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202301897265 0.150359130593 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0380001533054 0.0667264976115 57% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.