As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
The technology and technological advancements helps in making peoples' life easier and also replacing humans in some dangerous works such as mining. However, there are cases, that people depend on technology for simple and easy problems but that does not mean the ability of innovative thinking of humans deteriorate. I would strongly disagree with the statement for the following reasons.
Many advancements like kitchen appliances and home appliances are making lives easier by completing the everyday home jobs in short duration and also more importantly, those are automatic and requires no human intervention. Many works at home does not essentially require cognitive skills. Therefore, relying on technology for performing those jobs does not hinder our ability to think, instead, it helps people to invest time in more useful works which requires our intellectual skills.
There are some works need to perform at the places which are dangerous or the work itself is dangerous such as work at cement industries where minute particles of cement may enter lungs and results in long term diseases such as lung fibrosis. Also, for mining, workplace and work both may be dangerous and may result in loss of life of workers. Replacing human force with robots can substantially reduce dangers, loss of lives and effectively save people from danger without hindering work.
Moreover, many jobs requiring manual labor and not cognitive skills in places like construction fields and textile industries, the man force can be replaced by many machines without any issue. There is hindrance to person's ability to think. Instead, he/she can put their efforts into something which may improve their life and lifestyle.
Moreover, there are certain jobs where a machine cannot replace human such as to program and operate the machine, public leadership and solving public problems, research in many scientific fields which require humans to think.
Overall, relying on technology is beneficial to the people in many fields and also in day-to-day lives and does not hinder people's ability to think since there many fields where a machine cannot operate solely and requires human intervention and the ability to think.
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 50
- Governments should invest as much in the arts as they do in the military 50
- A recent study indicates that children living in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal have lower levels of tooth decay than children living in suburban areas in the United States despite the fact that people in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal rec 50
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports swimming boating and fishing among their favorite recreational activities The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits however and the city park department devotes little of i 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, as to, in short, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 33.0505617978 39% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1874.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 349.0 442.535393258 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36962750716 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6528866488 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.504297994269 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 589.5 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.8893300586 60.3974514979 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.857142857 118.986275619 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9285714286 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 5.21951772744 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246562454224 0.243740707755 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0937932641126 0.0831039109588 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0901568523129 0.0758088955206 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137197225197 0.150359130593 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0854788810115 0.0667264976115 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 48.8420337079 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.