We all had maths in our school education, where we have learned basic math operations such as addition, subtraction. This basic maths is very useful in our day to day operations like counting money. But as we grew up, we started using a calculator for faster results. Though the result is fast, its effect on us is adverse. We don’t realize but inadvertently we are relying on it too much, it’s making our intellects weak to do even the most basics of calculations.
Before the rise of the internet in 1990’s, most of us used to try and do our holiday homework by researching extensively, either by asking our parents or family members who might know about it or by reading a lot of books to gain insight into the topic. This practice although now seems to be tough, it was not only really creative but it expanded our intellects as we were trying to figure out the solution through all possible means.
With the rise of internet search(also called Google), the kids now don’t need to interact with people or read related books, instead, they just have to type in the name of the topic they are looking for in the google search, and boom the answer is there in less than a second. So even though the life has become easy with the rise of technology, the ability of humans to think and expand their boundaries has surely deteriorated.
- The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015 61
- Formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and s 66
- The most ideal path for a society to set up its youngsters for positions of authority in government industry or different fields is by imparting in them a feeling of collaboration not rivalry Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you a 75
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 58
- The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 33, Rule ID: IN_1990s[2]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1990’s'.
Suggestion: in the 1990’s
...tions. Before the rise of the internet in 1990’s, most of us used to try and do our holi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 63, Rule ID: TRY_AND[1]
Message: "Try and" is common in colloquial speech, but "'try to'" is recommended for writing.
Suggestion: try to
... internet in 1990’s, most of us used to try and do our holiday homework by researching ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, really, second, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.4196629213 16% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.3162921348 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1101.0 2235.4752809 49% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 241.0 442.535393258 54% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56846473029 5.05705443957 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 4.55969084622 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53735712126 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 215.323595506 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.634854771784 0.4932671777 129% => OK
syllable_count: 342.9 704.065955056 49% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 20.2370786517 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.1679775165 60.3974514979 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.333333333 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7777777778 23.4991977007 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.21951772744 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0630066940922 0.243740707755 26% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0269596091096 0.0831039109588 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04161831169 0.0758088955206 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0436125194185 0.150359130593 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460756459375 0.0667264976115 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 48.8420337079 127% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 12.1639044944 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 100.480337079 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.