As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
With the advent of new technology life has been easier. A lot has been said and done to highlight the implication of technology on basic human nature. The most harmful impact has been satiated attitude that human race has developed, thanks to innumerable Apps and inventions that is at our disposal. Therefore, it is imperative for human race to rely less on technology and more on manual efforts to build up the brain muscle.
The bone of contention lies in reasoning of an individual which gets paralyzed thanks to daily assault that human brain faces with simple click. Yes ‘the simple click/tap’ that generates a simple yes or displays complex results in matter of seconds. Human brain stops questioning the how? and Why?, affecting its critical ability to perceive things.
Let’s take auto correct and very common tool that comes in handy in when writing mailers or taking down important notes. People have forgotten how it felt to write in an unmonitored setting. The average writing score of gre applicants in 2015 dipped by 0.5 points, as compared to 2001 writing score. The test examiner’s complained that major score losses were due to incorrect spelling and grammatical errors.
We should also not ignore the fact that technology that is developed cannot be applicable in every setting. Say an Algorithm is developed to fly a space ship from earth to moon. It is not necessary that the same algorithm can be used to move from moon to mars. Here the different things get factored in that was not considered earlier in developing the algorithm. Having said that simple algorithms around the worlds have made scaled up our businesses, and took our research programs to unprecedented heights.
In short, Technology cannot be ignored however skillset cannot be ignored. To reiterate everything, technology today has overwhelmed the human intelligent quotient, the ability of human mind to function without these needs to be improved. It’s best that individuals take time to appreciate the complex scheme of things.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-19 | koshagohil | 16 | view |
| 2022-01-19 | koshagohil | 58 | view |
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 16
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 58
- In any field of endeavor it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements in that field 58
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 66
- Formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and s 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 281, Rule ID: THE_HOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'how'?
Suggestion: how
... seconds. Human brain stops questioning the how? and Why?, affecting its critical abili...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 290, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
... Human brain stops questioning the how? and Why?, affecting its critical ability to...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, second, so, therefore, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1710.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 333.0 442.535393258 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13513513514 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72265243094 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 215.323595506 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615615615616 0.4932671777 125% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 704.065955056 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.4996641774 60.3974514979 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.5 118.986275619 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.65 23.4991977007 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.21951772744 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144665879789 0.243740707755 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0390676791853 0.0831039109588 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.056525578722 0.0758088955206 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0726686346028 0.150359130593 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0639832123061 0.0667264976115 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.