The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015.
The bar graph shows how many sites people used in two different years in Canada. The data is shown in percentage. Each year is represented by two colours, green for 2014 and blue for 2015.
It was observed that the number of people using only one site was the highest in the years 2014 and 2015. It was 36% in the year 2014, while it fell by 8% in the year 2015.
Furthermore, it was noted that the number of people watching 2 or no sites was approximately the same. In 2014, the percentage of people watching no sites was 22% while it was 23% for people watching two sites at a time. However, in the year 2015, this percentage decreased by 1% for the former and decreased for the latter.
The percentage then started decreasing as the number of sites scaled up. It went down to 12% and 16% when the number of sites increased up-till 3.
Only 2-5% of people used four to five sites in the year 2014, whilst it was 4-8% in the year 2015.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-19 | koshagohil | 67 | view |
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 58
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 58
- Formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and s 66
- Clay pots of a particular specific design have earlier been found in the surrounding area of the prehistoric village of Karia and so were supposed to have been made exclusively by the people from Karia However of late archeologists discovered a Karian cla 55
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 16
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 762.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.25698324022 4.92477711251 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26206629337 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.480446927374 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 215.1 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.0012576013 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 69.2727272727 112.824112599 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2727272727 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.36363636364 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271325903088 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123468221922 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0740232952426 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178351082563 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0363210945764 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.8 13.2329268293 51% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 89.08 61.2550243902 145% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.8 10.3012195122 47% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 7.13 11.4140731707 62% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.55 8.06136585366 81% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.