As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Various innovation and development took place in the field of technology which has made a significant impact
on our lives in different ways. With the invention of technology we become more powerful.
We have the ability to transform the environment, extend our life time, create big and interconnected societies
and even explore various new things about the universe.
Today, we use technology from morning to evening, from the simplest nail cutter to television and personal laptop.
Technology has touched all aspects of our lives, whether it is mobile phones, kettle, kitchen microwave, electric cooker,
television, water heaters, remote control, fridge, and other larger communication systems such as the internet facilities,
railways, air-routes, and so on. Thus, technology plays an extremely crucial role in the lives of human beings.
With the advent of new technology, life has been easier.A lot has been said and done to highlight the
implication of technology on basic human nature.
A quick reflection on a typical day reveals how technology has revolutionized the world.
Most people commute to work in an automobile that runs on a internal combustion engine.
During a workday chances are high ,that a person will interact with a computer that processes information on silicon bridges
that are .09 microns wide.
Upon leaving home, family members will be reached through wireless networks that utilize satellites orbiting the earth.
Each of these common occurrences could have been inconceivable at the turn of the 19th century.
The statement attempts to bridge these dramatic changes to a reduction in the ability of humans to think for themselves.
The assumption is that an increased reliance on technology negates the need for people to think creatively to solve previous
quandaries.
Looking back at the introduction, one could argue that without a car, computer, or mobile phone, the hypothetical worker
would need to find alternate methods of transport, information processing and communication.
Technology short circuits this thinking by making the problems obsolete.
However, this reliance on technology does not necessarily preclude the creativity that marks the human species.
The prior examples reveal that technology allows for convenience.
The car, computer and phone all release additional time for people to live more efficiently.
This efficiency does not preclude the need for humans to think for themselves.
In fact, technology frees humanity to not only tackle new problems, but may itself create new issues
that did not exist without technology.
For example, the proliferation of automobiles has introduced a need for fuel conservation on a global scale.
In contrast to the statement, we can even see how technology frees the human imagination.
Consider how the digital revolution and the advent of the internet have allowed for an unprecedented exchange of ideas.
WebMD, a popular internet portal for medical information, permits patients to self-research symptoms for a more informed
doctor visit. This exercise opens pathways of thinking that were previously closed off to the medical layman.
This example provides the most hope in how technology actually provides a future of humanity.
Technology will always mark the human experience, from the discovery of fire to the implementation of nanotechnology.
Given the history of human race, there will be no limit to the number of problems, both new and old, for us to tackle.
We should embrace a hopeful posture to the possibilities that technology provides for new avenues of human imagination.
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 58
- Formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and s 66
- Some people believe that success in creative fields such as painting fiction writing and film making primarily requires hard work and perseverance Others believe that such success mainly requires innate talents that cannot be learned 66
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 66
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 109, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...logy which has made a significant impact on our lives in different ways. With the...
^^^
Line 5, column 62, Rule ID: LIFE_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lifetime'?
Suggestion: lifetime
...o transform the environment, extend our life time, create big and interconnected societie...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 112, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... create big and interconnected societies and even explore various new things abou...
^^^
Line 12, column 57, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: A
...of new technology, life has been easier.A lot has been said and done to highlight...
^
Line 12, column 102, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... has been said and done to highlight the implication of technology on basic human...
^^^
Line 15, column 59, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...e to work in an automobile that runs on a internal combustion engine. During a w...
^
Line 16, column 34, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...gine. During a workday chances are high ,that a person will interact with a compu...
^^
Line 16, column 125, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...processes information on silicon bridges that are .09 microns wide. Upon leavin...
^^^
Line 22, column 125, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le to think creatively to solve previous quandaries. Looking back at the introd...
^^^
Line 24, column 121, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or mobile phone, the hypothetical worker would need to find alternate methods of ...
^^^
Line 38, column 121, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lf-research symptoms for a more informed doctor visit. This exercise opens pathwa...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, if, look, may, so, thus, as to, for example, in contrast, in fact, such as, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 78.0 58.6224719101 133% => OK
Nominalization: 27.0 12.9106741573 209% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3214.0 2235.4752809 144% => OK
No of words: 580.0 442.535393258 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54137931034 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.90746259869 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01189871812 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 320.0 215.323595506 149% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551724137931 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 1002.6 704.065955056 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 20.2370786517 153% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.7669307213 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.677419355 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7096774194 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.67741935484 5.21951772744 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 37.0 4.97078651685 744% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 11.0 7.80617977528 141% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.412280689856 0.243740707755 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102756641424 0.0831039109588 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137108063045 0.0758088955206 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0878141920956 0.150359130593 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130752649825 0.0667264976115 196% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.1639044944 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.38706741573 113% => OK
difficult_words: 183.0 100.480337079 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.