People should undertake risky action only after they have carefully considered its consequences Instructions Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the positio

It is irresponsible to take a risk without considering what could potentially go wrong. The prompt suggests that people should only undertake risky action after considering the potential consequences. I strongly agree with this claim and I will discuss the necessary points to defend my stance.

To begin with, why would anyone in their right mind take on a risk that could potentially result in acute injury? Take for instance a traveler in Hawaii who has no cliff diving experience. To jump off a cliff into the ocean without knowing how hide the tide is, whether or not the rock they are jumping from is wet, or knowing how to get out of the water once you've jumped off could put your life in danger. It would be wise to go with others who have experience with this activity and have knowledge about the area this activity is being done at rather than blindly taking a risk.

To expand on the point, aside from cliff jumping, another activity in Hawaii that travelers should consider the consequences of before trying is surfing. It would be reckless to go out into the ocean on a day when a high surf advisory warning has been given out. Some people think they would be fine if they paddle out into an advanced surf spot on a day with big waves; however, they could end up being slammed into a coral reef. This could result in death or serious injury, especially if the tide is low. It would be best to find a beginner spot to learn at that provides lessons in order to reduce the risk of injury when undertaking this risky sport.

Although, in contrast to my position, it is true that not all risky actions have to be carefully considered before undertaking in the activity. For example, a billionaire could gamble lots of money at a casino without fear of repercussions in the form of physical harm or financial harm. For someone like Bill Gates, losing a few thousand dollars in one night and probably wouldn't make much of a dent in his wallet. He donates more money to charity than he could potentially lose in a game of poker. However, for most people, it would be important to consider the risks of gambling large amounts of cash. Thus, it is imperative that the vast majority of gamblers consider the risks of gambing a lot of money.

In conclusion, although it is true that some folks could undertake risky action without considering the consequences, it is paramount that people carefully consider all of the potential outcomes with taking a risk.

Votes
Average: 6.5 (2 votes)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 263, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...n without knowing how hide the tide is, whether or not the rock they are jumping from is wet, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 361, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: you've
...nowing how to get out of the water once youve jumped off could put your life in dange...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 374, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...usand dollars in one night and probably wouldnt make much of a dent in his wallet. He d...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 166, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...aramount that people carefully consider all of the potential outcomes with taking a risk.
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, in contrast to, it is true, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.6327345309 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.9520958084 131% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 11.1786427146 63% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 13.6137724551 88% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 28.8173652695 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 80.0 55.5748502994 144% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 16.3942115768 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2035.0 2260.96107784 90% => OK
No of words: 438.0 441.139720559 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64611872146 5.12650576532 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57476223824 4.56307096286 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5365995494 2.78398813304 91% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 204.123752495 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527397260274 0.468620217663 113% => OK
syllable_count: 639.0 705.55239521 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 4.96107784431 242% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 8.76447105788 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.22255489022 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 19.7664670659 96% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.8473053892 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7449053073 57.8364921388 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.105263158 119.503703932 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0526315789 23.324526521 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26315789474 5.70786347227 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 6.88822355289 174% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.67664670659 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176455354484 0.218282227539 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0593375249211 0.0743258471296 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645811246668 0.0701772020484 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121390817274 0.128457276422 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0521847567822 0.0628817314937 83% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.3799401198 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.3550499002 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.197005988 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 12.5979740519 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.32208582834 97% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 98.500998004 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 12.3882235529 69% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.1389221557 101% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.