The prompt suggests that Humanities courses should not be required for undergraduate students majoring in Business or in the Sciences because those classes will not benefit their future careers. I mostly agree with the claim and will elaborate on the necessary points to defend my stance.
Firstly, most Humanities requirements, such as History, will not benefit Business or Science majors. For example, learning about the legacy of Asia will not benefit any of these students in the careers they are seeking. The cirriculum should focus on topics that will prove to be useful and will help students perform well in their future endeavors. This general education requirement is largely a waste of time for most students because they will never use the information that they are forced to learn.
To expand on the point, how does American History benefit anyone who plans to pursue a career in scientific research? The short answer is, it doesn't whatsoever. A study from Princeton University showed 95% of students who have graduated from a university do not use any of the information they've learned in History courses in their future careers. The research revealed that these classes only benefited those who were planning to enter a career in teaching history.
On the other hand, Humanities classes such as English Composition are important for all majors. The ability to write effectively, formulate an argument, and provide evidence to back up that argument is imperative for careers in Business and in the Sciences. However, this is the only Humanities course that provides any benefit to students within those majors. Thus, the cirriculum should be changed so that History is not required for undergraduate students in these fields.
In conclusion, although it is true that Humanities courses such as English should be required for Business and Science undergradate students, all other Humanities courses should be extinguished from the general education requirements.
- People should undertake risky action only after they have carefully considered its consequences Instructions Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the positio 65
- The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead 62
- The following is an excerpt from a speech given to the School Board about a change to the curriculum Because the future will be dominated by technology we must make four years of computer programming mandatory for all high school students If our students 63
- A recently issued twenty year study on headaches suffered by the residents of Mentia investigated the possible therapeutic effect of consuming salicylates Salicylates are members of the same chemical family as aspirin a medicine used to treat headaches Al 72
- The following was presented as part of a business plan by Apex Corporation To answer the increased demand for artisan coffee Apex Corporation is releasing a new line of coffee Gourmet Select Apex Corporation will first introduce the coffee into majo 50
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 143, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...tific research? The short answer is, it doesnt whatsoever. A study from Princeton Univ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 290, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they've
...rsity do not use any of the information theyve learned in History courses in their fut...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, so, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1674.0 2235.4752809 75% => OK
No of words: 314.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33121019108 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78035509556 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 215.323595506 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496815286624 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 704.065955056 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4167594254 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.6 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9333333333 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 5.21951772744 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347373245195 0.243740707755 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12018819738 0.0831039109588 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110361742502 0.0758088955206 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217812357503 0.150359130593 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0774605025892 0.0667264976115 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 100.480337079 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 143, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...tific research? The short answer is, it doesnt whatsoever. A study from Princeton Univ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 290, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they've
...rsity do not use any of the information theyve learned in History courses in their fut...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, so, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1674.0 2235.4752809 75% => OK
No of words: 314.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33121019108 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78035509556 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 215.323595506 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496815286624 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 704.065955056 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4167594254 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.6 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9333333333 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 5.21951772744 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347373245195 0.243740707755 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12018819738 0.0831039109588 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110361742502 0.0758088955206 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217812357503 0.150359130593 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0774605025892 0.0667264976115 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 100.480337079 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.