People should undertake risky action only after they have carefully considered its consequences Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In

Essay topics:

People should undertake risky action only after they have carefully considered its consequences.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.

Some people believe that it is better to think carefully before they take risky action, while others think there is no need to do so. It is obvious that after thinking thoroughly the person will be more analytical to consider whether it is beneficial to do the job, but at the expense of precious time. Form my point of view, I think although it is people's personality to decide whether or not to have a careful thinking, I will tend to undertake risky action after careful consideration.

Although under some urgent and risky circumstance, it is impossible for someone to think carefully. For instance, as for the fireman, who will be the first to save in the earthquake, the boy or the girl? The truth is no matter who is the first one to be rescued, the firefighter should not be blamed. Because faced such a vital dilemma, the firefighter must make decision as well as saving the kids almost simultaneously. In other words, if fireman hesitate to consider who would be the first to get out, two lives may be disappear.

However, when being stimulated by a new item or ignited by a disgusting person , some people may get out of control. Without thinking carefully, people will do something risky that they would be regretful for having done. To make things worse, they would disobey the law and then be sent to prison. There are many examples like two person fight with each other on the street and both of them get hurt in the end only because one person say something bad to another. It is definitely a small controversial, right? The fight can be avoided if both of them think carefully, which embodies the importance of considering before undertaking actions, as it can make people calm down, reflecting themselves.

Another benefit to have carefully consideration before take risk is that people can analyse the advantages and disadvantages about the task. They will have the chance to reduce the possibility of failure and improve the possibility to success. For example, when I am doing a big task, I can divide them into small pieces that I can ask other for help to do together which will increase the efficiency.(372)

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-04-07 guozhishan 50 view
2023-06-06 ice123 58 view
2022-09-30 YACHI PATEL 50 view
2022-08-24 Sujan Adhikari 70 view
2022-08-04 Tee_Jay 33 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user guozhishan :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 380, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...ugh it is peoples personality to decide whether or not to have a careful thinking, I will tend...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 79, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...w item or ignited by a disgusting person , some people may get out of control. Wit...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, so, then, well, while, as for, for example, for instance, i think, as well as, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1777.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 371.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7897574124 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83063750267 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530997304582 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 567.9 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1639152743 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.529411765 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8235294118 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23529411765 5.21951772744 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16672482201 0.243740707755 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0554963080586 0.0831039109588 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0437423281502 0.0758088955206 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105824697115 0.150359130593 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038388649735 0.0667264976115 58% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 100.480337079 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.