People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
__________
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
As humans we make decisions almost every other passing second of our lives, some we take back afterwards, some we ruminate and identify as bad decisions, Nonetheless we are the culmination of our decisions. People belive logic and emotion do not mix, same way religion and science do not, However, I agree that making hasty, or cursory decisions and then trying to defend such actions at a later time is a portend of a bad decision maker and a bad leader.
To begin, History is filled with instance of this very type of occurrence, One recent example would be the decision by the National police force of Nigeria to not disband the notorious unit- SARS: special anti-roberry squad- that have abused, extorted and carried out mas police brutality on the citizens of Nigeria. .When asked, the Inspector general of the Police put forward a seemingly logical set of reasons for his decision, however it has since been revealed that his decision was solely based of appealing his base within the presiding government. The above example quintessentially illustrates the reason why I support the author's conclusion that leaders who make bad decisions with emotion and not limpid logid are in fact bad decision makers and not fit for positions where decisions made are non-trivial.
Further, emoton at its core is devoid of any logical reasoning, and no spin can be put on that. Why? well this is because as humans when we are in experiencing emotions that range from ectasy to anger/pain, there exist scientific studies that say that we are, in that emotional state, unable to reach any logical conclusions or put together multiple inputs and give a coherent, defensible answer. This is due to the chemical imbalance in the brain. It is there unproductive to try and explain or defend actions taken in an emotional state. Because in doing so one has given away his position and it can be clearly seen that he or she is a poor leader.
Ofcourse, there could be instances where such logic afterwards might be coherent, however I would argue that this would be solely based on luck and not the person's actual doing. It is therefore clear that decisions made in either state could not possibly be explained by the other.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-30 | yixova3193 | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-09 | Truss | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-04 | Adesina Boluwatito | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-01 | shamika@25 | 50 | view |
| 2023-09-14 | RIYA MODI | 58 | view |
- An international development organization in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A While seeds for this new type of millet cost more farmers will be paid 58
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 405, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... defend such actions at a later time is a portend of a bad decision maker and a bad leade...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 318, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...e brutality on the citizens of Nigeria. .When asked, the Inspector general of the...
^
Line 3, column 319, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: When
... brutality on the citizens of Nigeria. .When asked, the Inspector general of the Pol...
^^^^
Line 3, column 633, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...llustrates the reason why I support the authors conclusion that leaders who make bad de...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 102, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Well
...g, and no spin can be put on that. Why? well this is because as humans when we are i...
^^^^
Line 5, column 478, Rule ID: TRY_AND[1]
Message: "Try and" is common in colloquial speech, but "'try to'" is recommended for writing.
Suggestion: try to
... the brain. It is there unproductive to try and explain or defend actions taken in an e...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nonetheless, second, so, then, therefore, well, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1840.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 379.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85488126649 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63483647554 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583113456464 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 603.0 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 23.0359550562 135% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 86.3013132384 60.3974514979 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.333333333 118.986275619 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.5833333333 23.4991977007 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.21951772744 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281132407091 0.243740707755 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0906634960194 0.0831039109588 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0641050734922 0.0758088955206 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161308792354 0.150359130593 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.056202024161 0.0667264976115 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 14.1392134831 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 48.8420337079 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.1743820225 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.38706741573 113% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.8971910112 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 11.2143820225 128% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.7820224719 153% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.