People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
There's a saying "Look before you leap", not "after you leap". It is of no use to look after you have already leapt, because by then, the damage, if any, would already have been done. Similarly, we need to think with logic before making any decision and not after. So, I agree with the given argument that people who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are indeed poor decision makers. This is because of two reasons.
Firstly, it doesn't matter how well they justify those decisions afterwards, because it won't can't change the result. And if they have made those decisions based solely on emotion, there's a high probability that the result won't be what they wanted it to be. So, if the result is damaging and even if the justifications seem well and good, it won't matter. For example, if you are playing a game of chess, and if the opponent taunts you and you make some capricious decisions, you will find yourself in a much more losing position than you previously were. Even if you justify your moves, it won't matter then. The damage has already been done. So, we should always try to think rationally and logically instead of emotionally before making any decisions.
Secondly, if you always try to think logically before making any decision, the result in most cases will be positive, even though it is not exactly what you wanted it to be. And if the result is not what you wanted, it wouldn't have been any better have you made the decision driven by emotion. Even if you fail, you will know that you tried your best. But if you make decisions emotionally and fail, you will always think that maybe you could have done better if you thought logically. So, irrespective of the result, it is always best to make decisions calmly and logically. Making decisions logically also helps you identify your mistakes afterwards. But in case of impulsive decisions you will just think that your mistake was being impulsive, and overlook the real mistakes. For example, in the game of chess, even if you lose after making logical moves, you wil know you tried your best and also you will know what were your faults and mistakes. This will help you get better.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-30 | yixova3193 | 66 | view |
| 2023-11-03 | Aishwarya01 | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-09 | Truss | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-04 | Adesina Boluwatito | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-01 | shamika@25 | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: There's
Theres a saying 'Look before you leap&apo...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 95, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...'after you leap'. It is of no use to look after you have already leapt, b...
^^^
Line 2, column 13, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...is because of two reasons. Firstly, it doesnt matter how well they justify those deci...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 93, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...e decisions afterwards, because it wont cant change the result. And if they have mad...
^^^^
Line 2, column 179, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
...hose decisions based solely on emotion, theres a high probability that the result wont...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 219, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...f the result is not what you wanted, it wouldnt have been any better have you made the ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, may, second, secondly, similarly, so, then, well, for example, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 60.0 33.0505617978 182% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 58.6224719101 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1832.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 388.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72164948454 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40042420171 2.79657885939 86% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.451030927835 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 580.5 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 6.24550561798 240% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 11.0 3.10617977528 354% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.906276602 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.2380952381 118.986275619 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4761904762 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38095238095 5.21951772744 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258928552095 0.243740707755 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108206503751 0.0831039109588 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.165405259911 0.0758088955206 218% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233154105323 0.150359130593 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125898862593 0.0667264976115 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 14.1392134831 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 12.1639044944 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.38706741573 85% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 100.480337079 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.