The perceived greatness of any political leader has more to do with the challenges faced by that leader than with any of his/her inherent skills and abilities
The prompt talked about the metric in which a leader can be ranked and cited the challenges faced by that particular leader as a great gauge, this is true for every context whether political, sports, business or even family and I agree based on the following thought process.
"Smooth seas do not make great sailors", this goes to show that the true test of a person, especially a leader's greatness is in in their sanguineness and sangfroid.
History has taught us that every prominent and remarkable leader right from the birth of time has had their fair share of difficulties in order to be lauded as a great leader, Malcom X had to deal with oppositions who wanted him gone at all cost but his steadfast attitude and composure prior to his assassination made him stand out till date as a great leader because he didn't cower to pressure and difficulties, Prophet Yusuf in the Quran was Prime Minister of Egypt during his time and what stood out from his reign was the aptitude and virtuoso he displayed during the time of famine and dearth of food, as a disaster that he foresaw, he made appropriate plans in order to allay the menace to the lowest minimum and this, out of all the numerous achievements during his reign, is what stands out till date.
It is fair to not that, there are great leaders too who have once ruled or governed and the absence of major challenges during their does not in any way derogate their rule, a popular example was Umar Musa Yar'adua who once ruled the Republic of Nigeria, his reign stand out in the ease and increased standard of living which was experienced and this serves to be enough to rank him a great leader
In conclusion, challenges are a true test of a man's prowess and greatness and as a such a great leader is someone who has "stood the test of time" and excelled therefore all great leaders, be it political or not, should be ranked based on the trials and tribulations they experienced
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-27 | Oladelejnrr | 50 | view |
| 2015-09-12 | a.chaharsoughi | 60 | view |
- The drawbacks to the use of nuclear power mean that it is not a long term solution to the problem of meeting eve increasing energy needs 83
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society one must study its major cities 50
- Technological advancement has made our lives easier and more convenient but it has also brought about significant ethical challenges To what extent should ethical considerations shape the development and use of technology 50
- People who have high expectations for others are rewarded with high performance and respect 50
- If a goal is worthy then any means taken to attain it are justifiable 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 115, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
...the true test of a person, especially a leaders greatness is in in their sanguineness a...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 136, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: in
...rson, especially a leaders greatness is in in their sanguineness and sangfroid. Hist...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 373, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... till date as a great leader because he didnt cower to pressure and difficulties, Pro...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, therefore, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.4196629213 16% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1614.0 2235.4752809 72% => OK
No of words: 349.0 442.535393258 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62464183381 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61800815816 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530085959885 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 704.065955056 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 20.2370786517 20% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 87.0 23.0359550562 378% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 268.727092047 60.3974514979 445% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 403.5 118.986275619 339% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 87.25 23.4991977007 371% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 9.25 5.21951772744 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 10.2758426966 19% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239479699725 0.243740707755 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140363340196 0.0831039109588 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0224431522929 0.0758088955206 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129998953944 0.150359130593 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00967546083058 0.0667264976115 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 44.0 14.1392134831 311% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 0.09 48.8420337079 0% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 34.9 12.1743820225 287% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 10.7 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.53 8.38706741573 137% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.8971910112 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 36.8 11.2143820225 328% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.