A person who knowingly commits a crime has broken the social contract and should not retain any civil rights or the right to benefit from his or her own labor
It is a common practice that the rudiments or first step to labor employments are the basis of the agreements (which includes financial commitments, jobs descriptions, ethic amongst others) between the parties involved. Noting that beyond financial revenues, what keeps a firm running and producing results are the unique approaches and ethics upholded by the firm. As such, the prompts which suggest that an individual civil rights should be terminated sequel to intentional malfeasances is one which I strongly with for two reasons.
To begin with, the gravest offense are those committed intentionally fully aware of the consequences of one's actions to the organization. Imagine a scenario where a company has been working on launching an unconventional product that have been designed for years and a trusted employee truncated the unprecedent launch of the long anticipated product by leaking the design proxy to a competitor -probably through compensation or a machination done to get back at the firm. Realistically, the judicial court have witnessed lots of cases premised around such circumstances where trusted employees betray their companies by rendering in a nonplussed state on the way forward on their propitious projects or related assignments. It is no gainsaying that such perfidy should be treated with great disciplinary approaches which should include a lack a total withdrawal of the perquisite of the miscreants from the company endowments and possibly handing them over to the appropriate authorities for further prosecution.
In furtherance, retaining the civil right of an offender is a ground for future employees to commit the same offenses citing the previously tolerated wrongdoings as a justification for their actions. It is possible that an employee that is tired of working in a firm scheme with like-minded employees to financially exploit the firm. At least, they will be certain of receiving their entitlements if their plots become exposed and the worst action is to dismiss them from a job they are already tired of. No matter the position of a firm that brook these acts without intransigent muckraking of complicit, such firm will eventually been dwindled to the barest minimum in a more irreversible negative circumstances. Noting the risk associated with retaining the exclusive rights of offenders to a firm, it would be a gross negligence to trend in such path.
However, some intentional wrongdoings might not be considered grave by the implicated employee. It is possible that an employee might have been pressurized to commit such actions without a tactful consideration of the great consequences. Some long-term employees might have even sacrificed more for the firm than their intentional offenses. Noting that all humans are prone to commit errors, it would be too extreme to take away all of their fantasies, retirement plans, family wellbeing on the basis of an intentional not commensurate to the services such employee have rendered to the firm. Nevertheless, the notion of clemency towards offenses should not be flaunted to the laborer as it put the firm in great jeopardy and at a risk of becoming imperiled if proper disciplinary actions are not taken.
Based on the pros and cons of the issue discussed, it is more reasonable to take away the rights of intentional offenders of social contract than to retain it which might a firm vulnerable to various circumstances.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-11 | Mithil | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | Anish Sapkota | 66 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | Gnyana | 62 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | Technoblade | 66 | view |
| 2023-03-16 | Yam Kumar Oli | 50 | view |
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and s 83
- Undergraduate students majoring in Business or in the Sciences should not be required to take any courses in the Humanities since those courses won t benefit their future careers Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree 75
- The first step to self knowledge is rejection of the familiar Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your po 96
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 66
- Technology while apparently aimed to simplify our lives only makes our lives more complicated Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develo 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 425, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'right'?
Suggestion: right
... which suggest that an individual civil rights should be terminated sequel to intentio...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 105, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ally fully aware of the consequences of ones actions to the organization. Imagine a ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 364, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntional offenses. Noting that all humans are prone to commit errors, it would be ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, nevertheless, so, well, at least, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 58.6224719101 130% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2892.0 2235.4752809 129% => OK
No of words: 546.0 442.535393258 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2967032967 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83390555256 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11411759589 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 279.0 215.323595506 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510989010989 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 882.9 704.065955056 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.6615689416 60.3974514979 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.666666667 118.986275619 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.3333333333 23.4991977007 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72222222222 5.21951772744 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107702934575 0.243740707755 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0379015557597 0.0831039109588 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.044054772341 0.0758088955206 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0736556651254 0.150359130593 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349004826225 0.0667264976115 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 14.1392134831 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 48.8420337079 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.1743820225 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.38706741573 116% => OK
difficult_words: 159.0 100.480337079 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.