Question Authority. Only by questioning accepted wisdom can we advance our understanding of the world.

Essay topics:

Question Authority. Only by questioning accepted wisdom can we advance our understanding of the world.

During childhood, human beings have the unique ability of questioning everything that round them. Unfortunately, when the child grows and engages into the habits of adults, many of them refrain from being an active inquisitor and start just accepting what everything accepts as unquestionable trues. During our lifetime, we arec constantly exposed to take a position, to listen arguments, to read statements and analyze ideas. Teachers, whose role during school years is quintessential, present ideas to the young minds. These minds, then go to the university, where they are immersed into arguments from the professors. I agree with the position that is necessary to question authorithy for the following reasons.
It is certainly true that we need a set of ideas and established institutions whose role is to protect and defend the ideas. Otherwise, none could have a basis to invent new ideas and support to ellaborate them. However, it is also true that as human beings, we made errors ands fail from time to time. It will be dangerous to overlook that fact. During Middle Ages, everyone just took as an accepted wisdom that Earth was the center of the Universe, but an intrepid man, Galileo, challenged the idea to propose that the Earth was moving around the Sun. In natural sciences, the challenge participation of scientists is necessary to evolve the human knowledge, thus questioning the authority must be the habitual role of scientists for the betterment of humankind.
Furthermore, social sciences need also to be tolerant to arguments that challenge previous wisdom. Only then, people can have a richer and varied perspective of society. Likewise the scientists of Galileo's era should have listen to him, current policymakers have to listen to everyones's ideas on how to make out a better nation. Without them, the policies would be exclusive for some people while damage the wealthness of others. In conclusion, whether the wisdom is a social statement or a natural idea, there is a need for questioning and listening everything and everyone to reach to a rational and well understood idea.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-01 Moustafa Nofale 16 view
2019-12-01 Moustafa Nofale 66 view
2019-12-01 Moustafa Nofale 66 view
2019-12-01 Moustafa Nofale 58 view
2019-12-01 Moustafa Nofale 66 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user mro9395 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 170, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Likewise,
...cher and varied perspective of society. Likewise the scientists of Galileos era should h...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 222, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'listened'.
Suggestion: listened
... scientists of Galileos era should have listen to him, current policymakers have to li...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, likewise, look, so, then, thus, well, while, as to, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1765.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 343.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14577259475 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87637957966 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588921282799 0.4932671777 119% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 704.065955056 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0288498084 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.823529412 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1764705882 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.21951772744 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154435301971 0.243740707755 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0444069090915 0.0831039109588 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383233113452 0.0758088955206 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103029399582 0.150359130593 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.015988339552 0.0667264976115 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.