Essay topics: ISSUE TOPIC: The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment.
The claim raises the polemic issue of wether an honest assessment of a musician can be made when he is alive because of the fame. Undisputably, the charisma and charm of the artist can influentiate the public's opinion of hist music quality. However, a talent assessment should not be made only to the technical aspects of the scores and sheets, but also to the entire and whole performance of the musician. Hence, I disagree with the claim that the artist need to be dead before we made an ideal assessment.
First, fame is a strenght indicator of the talent of the musician. Nowadays, during the era of music mobile applications and self-made Youtube artist, a miriad of new musicians has emerged, making the music industry a harsh and highly competitive environment. As a consequence, being famous and highlight from the rest is a signal that the artist has a unique characteristic and talent. Obviously, not every famous artist is talented, for example some musicians made famous because of inethical activities,but the fact the he has some fame usually correlates with talent.
Recalling the fact from the first paragraph that talent relates to the entire performance, the show and play that the musician shows on a concert or live-performance is important to considerate. These kind of characteristics is mainly featured by top famous artists. For instance, Michael Jackson was known not only because of its songs, but also because of its moves as a priceless dancer, which made his fame reach to unkown levels. Likewise, the
In conclusion, although fame can alter the public's opinion on the talent of the artist, fame is certainly an measurement that the artist was, indeed, talent in most of the cases. As long as the assessment is made by objective people, talent can be correctly assessed while the musician is alive. In fact, recognize the talent of him while is alive is a valueable gift for sharing his music with the world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-03 | Gbangbala Usman | 58 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Gnyana | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | Jbrachael | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | Ataraxia-m | 62 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | Ataraxia-m | 50 | view |
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company. "According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in an 23
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagre 50
- The following appears in a letter to the editor for the West Lansburg News:"The tufted groundhog lives in the coastal wetlands of West Lansburg. Ancient records suggest that the tufted groundhog once numbered in the millions. Since they were declared a wi 45
- The purpose of higher education is to prepare students for the future, but classen students are at a serious disadvantage in the competition for post-college employment due to the university's burdensome breadth requirements. classen's job placement rate 23
- Essay topics: ISSUE TOPIC: The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 203, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'publics'' or 'public's'?
Suggestion: publics'; public's
...harm of the artist can influentiate the publics opinion of hist music quality. However,...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 505, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , but
...e famous because of inethical activities,but the fact the he has some fame usually c...
^^^^
Line 2, column 519, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'he'?
Suggestion: the; he
...se of inethical activities,but the fact the he has some fame usually correlates with t...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 195, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'These kinds'?
Suggestion: This kind; These kinds
...erformance is important to considerate. These kind of characteristics is mainly featured b...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 44, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'publics'' or 'public's'?
Suggestion: publics'; public's
...conclusion, although fame can alter the publics opinion on the talent of the artist, fa...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 107, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...talent of the artist, fame is certainly an measurement that the artist was, indeed...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, likewise, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 33.0505617978 45% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1614.0 2235.4752809 72% => OK
No of words: 327.0 442.535393258 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93577981651 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86429599839 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 215.323595506 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507645259939 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 704.065955056 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2656719276 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.285714286 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3571428571 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35714285714 5.21951772744 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246169703969 0.243740707755 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0941601932767 0.0831039109588 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595674338915 0.0758088955206 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157939034586 0.150359130593 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473141045131 0.0667264976115 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.