The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment.
Popularity gained by any person can easily manipulte assessment of the real talent. The promt says that in order to perform assessment of the real talent of popular musican can be done unbiased only when musician dead for several years. I mostly agree with this position for two reasons which I elucidate below. But I do conede that if we are going to assess his talent during musians era then asseessment needs to somewhat altred.
Firstly, for assessing anyone's real talent correctly parameters like quality of content, it's impact on society and how many people like this should strictly consider. For instance, popular indian musician the late lata mangeshkar who was very eminent in her era. She composed many patriotic songs along with my romantic songs. After her death in 2020 many people assessed her and her real talent comes infront of world. This people assessed based on her qualtiy of work and it's impact on society and her fame does not hamper assessment.
Secondly, If assessment done after many years after death then many people will not aware of that musician. As we know world is changing day by day people's interest is also changing. If that musian has real talent it will come up infront of world after this many generation. For example, The popular musician from maharastra gogawale who was music composer during 18th century. Currently many people don't know about him but after some people done his assessment he found to be the best singer in maharastra till date.
In Conclusion, In order to perform assessment of musian during his era unbiased judges should assign in order to get correct assessment, however as per above reason I mostly agree with the promt's argument.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-03 | Gbangbala Usman | 58 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Gnyana | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | Jbrachael | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | Ataraxia-m | 62 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | Ataraxia-m | 50 | view |
- Humans have been battling the tropical disease malaria since at least the late fourth century B C This debilitating and deadly disease is actually a parasite which reproduces in humans and is spread through the saliva of mosquitoes when they suck blood fr 81
- A person should never make an important decision alone 60
- franchise businsess 80
- Men and women because of their inherent physical differences are not equally suited for many tasks 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 135, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...says that in order to perform assessment of the real talent of popular musican ca...
^^
Line 2, column 149, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ety and how many people like this should strictly consider. For instance, popular...
^^
Line 2, column 422, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
...her real talent comes infront of world. This people assessed based on her qualtiy of...
^^^^
Line 3, column 109, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...people will not aware of that musician. As we know world is changing day by day pe...
^^
Line 3, column 259, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun generation seems to be countable; consider using: 'many generations'.
Suggestion: many generations
...ill come up infront of world after this many generation. For example, The popular musician from...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 401, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ing 18th century. Currently many people dont know about him but after some people do...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1412.0 2235.4752809 63% => OK
No of words: 287.0 442.535393258 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91986062718 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38320903794 2.79657885939 85% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 215.323595506 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578397212544 0.4932671777 117% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 704.065955056 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.8893124773 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.1333333333 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1333333333 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 5.21951772744 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336288722402 0.243740707755 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116562359549 0.0831039109588 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0733298147734 0.0758088955206 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203324735117 0.150359130593 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0974576285823 0.0667264976115 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 14.1392134831 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 100.480337079 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.