The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment
There is a saying that "time is the true test of knowlegde". It can be inferred here that time is a true test of talent. The entertainment industry, particularly the music industry, is a complex and somewhat biased industry. The extent to which a musician's real talent can be evaluated is usually measured by how famous the musician is during his/her lifetime, but this may not be true in all cases and therefore, popularity cannot be used as a metric for a musician's talent.
Musician's such as Fela Kuti and Michael Jackson were very popular during their life time and this could have been an indication of how talented they were. However, they are still very much revered in the music industry and this shows that they have real talents. It would be argued that they were popular during their lifetime, which is true, but their fame could have belied their talents. For instance, there was a musician called Dabby D, who died in 1997 and she is rarely heard of, but it is said that she was quite popular during her lifetime. In the case of Dabby D, her fame could have made people thought that she was talented. But her name nor music is rarely heard of.
Moreover, it can be argued that the number of awards a musician recieves during his lifetime could be used to tell how talented the musician is. Bu the awards given to musicians as a sign of how talented they are during their lifetime cannot be trusted because most of these awards are bought and there given to musicians who can afford it. During their lifetime, these award would be referred to to indicate that a musician is more talented than another. However, after their death, when their wealth cannot influence people's judgement, their names and music are not heard of not posed as important in the music industry.
However, despite that true talent can be assessed mostly after death, there are cases when a musician's true talent can be assessed during their lifetime. Most talented musicians are popular during their lifetime. For instance, Ashake, has been topping the bill board since he started releasing music in 2019 till date. This consistency cannot be achieved if he were not truly talented.
In conclusion, talented musicians are usually popular during and after their lifetime. And in most cases, a talented musician is usually popular during their lifetime and remembered after death. Therefore, it would be more reasonable to assess a musician's true talent after they are long gone because, by then, their person would not influence people's judgement and only their music would speak for them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-03 | Gbangbala Usman | 58 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Gnyana | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | Jbrachael | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | Ataraxia-m | 62 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | Ataraxia-m | 50 | view |
- The tufted groundhog lives in the coastal wetlands of West Lansburg Ancient records suggest that the tufted groundhog once numbered in the millions Since they were declared a wildlife sanctuary in 2004 development along the coastal wetlands has been prohi 33
- GRE Argument The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this period most of the 66
- The autonomy of any country is based on the strength of its borders if the number of illegal immigrants entering a country cannot be checked both its economy and national identity are endangered Because illegal immigrants pose such threats every effort mu 50
- The following appeared in a memo from the director of a large group of hospitals In a controlled laboratory study of liquid hand soaps a concentrated solution of extra strength UltraClean hand soap produced a 40 percent greater reduction in harmful bacter 54
- The following is part of a memorandum from the president of Humana University Last year the number of students who enrolled in online degree programs offered by nearby Omni University increased by 50 percent During the same year Omni showed a significant 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 256, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a musician' or simply 'musicians'?
Suggestion: a musician; musicians
...at biased industry. The extent to which a musicians real talent can be evaluated is usually...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 469, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'musicians'' or 'musician's'?
Suggestion: musicians'; musician's
...larity cannot be used as a metric for a musicians talent. Musicians such as Fela Kuti...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 80, Rule ID: LIFE_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lifetime'?
Suggestion: lifetime
... Jackson were very popular during their life time and this could have been an indication ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 395, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: to
...lifetime, these award would be referred to to indicate that a musician is more talent...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 92, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a musician' or simply 'musicians'?
Suggestion: a musician; musicians
...ostly after death, there are cases when a musicians true talent can be assessed during thei...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 245, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a musician' or simply 'musicians'?
Suggestion: a musician; musicians
..., it would be more reasonable to assess a musicians true talent after they are long gone be...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, then, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in all cases, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 43.0 19.5258426966 220% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 33.0505617978 163% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2155.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 443.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86455981941 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42553494865 2.79657885939 87% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.406320541761 0.4932671777 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 684.0 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0357343274 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.619047619 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0952380952 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.21951772744 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280622351111 0.243740707755 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102922051853 0.0831039109588 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0770097415886 0.0758088955206 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193397928859 0.150359130593 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387732684053 0.0667264976115 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 100.480337079 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.