Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The given topic raises the controversial issue of whether scandals are useful or not, based on the premise that they focus our attention on problems while refuting the importance of the role of reformers and speakers in bringing the underlying problem to light. while scandals may hold some good regarding the fact that they bring to surface the underlying cause or aid for such scandals, nevertheless it undermines the role of reformers and speakers regarding the same. thus I generally disagree with the opinion that it is the occurrence of scandals focuses our attention to problems and would argue that while scandals do hold some merit, the role of reformers can not be neglected.
Firstly, while scandals do bring to light the various loopholes existent in a system, the hoi-polloi, in general, remain unconcerned about their occurrence, until the very scandal affects them directly, and often do less or nothing towards the eradication or correction of such problems. For example, how many of us have unequivocally voiced our opinion about a scandal or scam which may have occurred and suggested corrective measures for the same? The revelation of a scandal can be deemed as advantageous only if appropriate action is taken by the society to overturn its effects.
Secondly, reformers and speakers have taken upon the task of working towards the welfare of society by tirelessly working towards it. they voice their opinion unequivocally, thus inspiring other people to think on similar lines. For example, Mahatma Gandhi revolted against the imposition of salt tax, a tax which seemed undue and therefore a form of scandal. he posed as strong opposition to the unjust and scandalous salt tax levied on the people. he inspired people to oppose the oppressive government through the principles of non-violent intolerance. Another example can be the many whistleblowers who strive to reveal the various scams that take place. speakers also expose these scandals and also provide their insights concerning the same.
Finally, if these scandals are made known to the public, without the intervention of middlemen such as reformers and speakers, the occurrence of such unlawful acts can also cause people to think in a tangential manner. people may misconstrue certain details and may either harbor negative sentiments against a specific person or a group of people or may also concoct scandals inspired by the existing ones. The presence of reformers and speakers aids in directing the people's thought in the right direction.
In conclusion, although scandals are useful since they bring the causes of such problems to surface, one cannot undermine or neglect the importance of reformers and speakers who work towards the exposition of such wrongful acts and work towards the development of a harmonious society.
- MANY IMPORTANT DISCOVERIES OR CREATIONS ARE ACCIDENTAL: IT IS USUALLY WHILE SEEKING ANSWERS TO ONE QUESTION THAT WE COME ACROSS ANSWERS TO ANOTHER 83
- WELL BEING OF A SOCIETY IS ENHANCED WHEN MANY OF ITS PEOPLE QUESTION AUTHORITY 66
- Students are more responsible for their educations than are their teachers. 50
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 66
- The ancient Oppo tribe has long been thought to have huntedonly with wooden spearsbecause none of their cave paintings depict bows or arrows. Recently, however, flint arrowheads have been found among the fossilized bones of ibex, animals thought to be a s 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 263, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...inging the underlying problem to light. while scandals may hold some good regarding t...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 472, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
...ormers and speakers regarding the same. thus I generally disagree with the opinion t...
^^^^
Line 3, column 472, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: thus,
...ormers and speakers regarding the same. thus I generally disagree with the opinion t...
^^^^
Line 15, column 361, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
... undue and therefore a form of scandal. he posed as strong opposition to the unjus...
^^
Line 15, column 451, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...andalous salt tax levied on the people. he inspired people to oppose the oppressiv...
^^
Line 15, column 660, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Speakers
...veal the various scams that take place. speakers also expose these scandals and also pro...
^^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 196, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a tangential manner" with adverb for "tangential"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ful acts can also cause people to think in a tangential manner. people may misconstrue certain details...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 220, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...people to think in a tangential manner. people may misconstrue certain details and may...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, if, may, nevertheless, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, in general, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2399.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 452.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30752212389 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61088837703 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82211404245 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508849557522 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 737.1 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.6783559315 60.3974514979 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.117647059 118.986275619 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5882352941 23.4991977007 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.29411764706 5.21951772744 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196941729138 0.243740707755 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0633661820303 0.0831039109588 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558041104611 0.0758088955206 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110400566212 0.150359130593 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598902584037 0.0667264976115 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 14.1392134831 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 100.480337079 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.8971910112 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.