Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Majority of people in developed and developing countries live their life according to a timetable. They work very hard to make a living and have very little time for frivolity. They are so deeply invested in their work and their problems that they can scarcely spare some time to discuss and debate about problems plaguing the society, economy, country, etc. Hence, these people are always ready for saucy incidents and scandals to make their life interesting for a while. It becomes the hot topic of most conversations
For quite a while now, the Indian film industry has been facing the issue of nepotism. Many intellectuals within the industry, journalists and critics have talked about this issue. According to them, the Indian audience preferred to watch the poorly written films starring the children of film stars. This left minimal audience for the small-scale but perfectly written indigenous films. This the critics argued led to stagnation of not just the industry but also the society as unlike the small-scale films, these large-scale films failed to talk about the societal issues. However, the unfortunate suicide of a self-made actor and the alleged scandals involving his nepotic colleagues and his girlfriend drew a lot of attention to this issue. The people went out of their to voluntarily boycott these films and support the indigenous film industry.
Similarly, our society for centuries now had been ignorant to the plight of the sanitation workers. Many of them to this day live a disdainful life with little money and no access to basic necessities. No amount of work done by social reformers, protests by people belonging to this community could catch the attention of the burgoiese. But when a scandal involving the exploitation of the women folk of this community at the hands of a powerful political family comes out, people hit the streets with record numbers. They even manage to overthrow the leader of the party in power and demand better lives for these people.
On the other hand, something as pure as the Indpendence movemnts of countries didn’t need scandals. The words, speeches and protests of the reformers, leader were enough foran entire country of millions of people to protest and agitate for decades.
The above examples only prove that scandals can grab the attention and opinion of people quite easily ton problems than speakers and reformers. Only something as true as indeepnednce whicheverybody desires with unbeleviable conviction suffics with them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-20 | s.sim | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | s.sim | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | Technoblade | 83 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | Jonginn | 66 | view |
| 2023-05-12 | userxyz110 | 54 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 520, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...omes the hot topic of most conversations For quite a while now, the Indian film i...
^^^
Line 3, column 183, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...life with little money and no access to basic necessities. No amount of work done by social refor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, similarly, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 19.5258426966 26% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2105.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 406.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18472906404 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69245622746 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559113300493 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 653.4 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.8001143291 60.3974514979 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.25 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.21951772744 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0989092182786 0.243740707755 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0294810781663 0.0831039109588 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0285547300317 0.0758088955206 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.056265911594 0.150359130593 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389002108443 0.0667264976115 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 100.480337079 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.