For schools, assessing teacher’s teaching efficiency is a verry important issue. But is it better for other techears to assess or let students assess teachers?
It is crystal clear that if we consider a society as a sheap, techers are the captain of it. That is, nobody can deny the ipmrotance of this diamonds in the underpinning of the society. However, like every staff their efficiency should be evaluated. Some people see the students as the rightest person to assess the function, others believe that their co-workers are the exact person to do so. I personally subscribe to the prior one on the grounds that will be elucidated in the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, without shadow of doubt, the most acuaintenance of theachers’ working are studenst, since they spend most of their time teaching them. In other words, students interacting with their teachers not only in school time, but also they may participate in their private classes either. So as it is expected, we assign them as the righteous person to evaluate teachers’ function. On the other hand, if the teachers themselves undertake the assessment may misjudge based on bias and their mutual need. That is, they gave the best views to get the qualified evaluation from their co-workers. Otherwise, there urge discrepancy which ensue from disorder and anarchy among teachers.
Discussed issue from above mentioned point of view, I want to cling to the point from another perspective, the function and productivity of students are the most reliable indicator of a teacher’s efficiency. Regardless of those students lacking thrill of studying, most of the students attend to classes to get the best of it, and hope to rock in the university. Therefore, the outcome and results of a preponderance of students is the accomplishment of a teacher. So the students can do a goof assassement based on their grade report. To adhere to the concept from another facet, theachers mainly are expert in veriety of fields. Not only do not ther co-workers are not aware of the context, but also they are not engaged in the class. Thus, they can not make an appropriate evaluation.
To put it in a nutshell, the mst trustfull group of people who can be considered to evaluate teachers’ efficiency are students. They elapse most of their time with teachers and are more familier with the characteristic and teaching method of the teacher; regardless of bias, they can do the most right evaluation. Moreover, students have an specific avenue, grade report, to do assassement.
- For schools, assessing teacher’s teaching efficiency is a verry important issue. But is it better for other techears to assess or let students assess teachers? 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is a waste of money for government to fund space travel or space exploration. Give specific examples and details to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is a waste of money for government to fund space travel or space exploration. Give specific examples and details to support your answer. 76
- In order to stay healthy, many people tend to exercise. Some people tend to exercise individually such as running and riding bicycles, etc. Some people tend to participate in group exercises such as team sports. Which one do you prefer, why? 70
- For schools, assessing teacher’s teaching efficiency is a verry important issue. But is it better for other techears to assess or let students assess teachers? 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 137, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...t is, nobody can deny the ipmrotance of this diamonds in the underpinning of the soc...
^^^^
Line 4, column 343, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ght evaluation. Moreover, students have an specific avenue, grade report, to do as...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2004.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 396.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06060606061 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98199713405 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522727272727 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 614.7 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.1092612057 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4285714286 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8571428571 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7619047619 5.21951772744 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184168259025 0.243740707755 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0517395470265 0.0831039109588 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539295265022 0.0758088955206 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115317201765 0.150359130593 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0290342267683 0.0667264976115 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.