For schools, assessing teacher’s teaching efficiency is a verry important issue. But is it better for other techears to assess or let students assess teachers?
It is crystal clear that if we consider a society as a ship, teachers are the captain of it. That is, nobody can deny the importance of these diamonds in the underpinning of the society. However, like every staff their efficiency should be evaluated. Some people see the students as the rightest person to assess the function, others believe that their co-workers are the exact person to do so. I personally subscribe to the prior one on the grounds that will be elucidated in the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, without shadow of doubt, the most aqcuaintance of teachers’ working are students, since they spend most of their time teaching them. In other words, students interacting with their teachers not only in school-time, but also they may participate in their private classes either. So as it is expected, we assign them as the righteous person to evaluate teachers’ function. On the other hand, if the teachers themselves undertake the assessment may misjudge based on bias and their mutual need. That is, they gave the best views to get the qualified evaluation from their co-workers. Otherwise, there urge discrepancy which ensue from disorder and anarchy among teachers.
Discussed issue from above mentioned point of view, I want to cling to the point from another perspective, the function and productivity of students are the most reliable indicator of a teacher’s efficiency. Regardless of those students lacking thrill of studying, most of the students attend to classes to get the best of it, and hope to rock in the university. Therefore, the outcome and results of a preponderance of students is the accomplishment of a teacher. So the students can do a goof assessment based on their grade report. To adhere to the concept from another facet, teachers mainly are expert in a variety of fields. Not only do not their co-workers are not aware of the context, but also they are not engaged in the class. Thus, they can not make an appropriate evaluation.
To put it in a nutshell, the most trustful group of people who can be considered to evaluate teachers’ efficiency are students. They elapse most of their time with teachers and are more familiar with the characteristic and teaching method of the teacher; regardless of bias, they can do the most right evaluation. Moreover, students have a specific avenue, grade report, to do assessment.
- It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is a waste of money for government to fund space travel or space exploration. Give specific examples and details to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- For schools, assessing teacher’s teaching efficiency is a verry important issue. But is it better for other techears to assess or let students assess teachers? 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is a waste of money for government to fund space travel or space exploration. Give specific examples and details to support your answer. 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2002.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 396.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05555555556 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98121435265 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505050505051 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 614.7 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0887337785 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3333333333 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8571428571 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7619047619 5.45110844103 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222646619842 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.066883942654 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521766502672 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145891817996 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0172322722964 0.0645574589148 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.