Some believe that local communities should rely on citizen volunteers for projects benefiting those communities (e.g., organizing youth sports leagues and collecting donations for charity). Others believe that local communities are better served when professional community leaders with the necessary skills and time instead handle such projects.
Societal projects are for the benefit of Local Communities does not implies that citizen volunteer should do it. In the prompt, some believe that projects benefitting the community should be done citizen volunteers of that community. In my opinion, I disagree with this belief.
In some cases, it will be beneficial to employ the citizen volunteers for some minute or trivial projects. For instance, if there is a small religious ceremony in which only a few people gather. In this case small religious ceremony can much easily be handled by the volunteer of the society.
On the other hand, it would be of absolute necessity to employ professional if the project is big and requires meticulous work on it. For instance if there is shortage of power in the town due to some weather events. Then to restore the power supply it would be advisable to bring in the electrical workers, who handle this kind of things.
Furthermore, if the project is important enough then, professionals should do that work because, they will work on it with full attention and expend effort to ameliorate the underlying problem. Also, if a volunteer does not want to work and is forced to do the work, he or she will never do it with full attentiveness. For instance, the task of wiring a house which is important to all community can be done by the volunteer's but it requires special knowledge and skills to do such a meticulous task.
In conclusion, although sometimes it may be suitable to employ citizen volunteer for the task but the best option is that professional should do the work where it is possible
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports swimming boating and fishing among their favorite recreational activities The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits however and the city park department devotes little of i 50
- Argument Topic The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies 60
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition 50
- Television advertising directed toward young children aged two to five should not be allowed 70
- The following appeared as part of a petition sent to residents of Youngtown by an environmental protection group 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 69, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'imply'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: imply
...e benefit of Local Communities does not implies that citizen volunteer should do it. In...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 69, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'imply'
Suggestion: imply
...e benefit of Local Communities does not implies that citizen volunteer should do it. In...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...pinion, I disagree with this belief. In some cases, it will be beneficial to em...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, so, then, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, in my opinion, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 58.6224719101 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1327.0 2235.4752809 59% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 276.0 442.535393258 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80797101449 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77524643115 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 215.323595506 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496376811594 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 704.065955056 59% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5642160198 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.076923077 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2307692308 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.84615384615 5.21951772744 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247783153537 0.243740707755 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102616819267 0.0831039109588 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117139971341 0.0758088955206 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154213578538 0.150359130593 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128899506157 0.0667264976115 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 100.480337079 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.