Some people argue that successful leaders in government, industry, or other fields must be highly competitive. Other people claim that in order to be successful, a leader must be willing and able to cooperate with others.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
One portion of the prompt urges that to be successful a leader, one has to be competitive. On the other hand another portion of it says that - without being cooperative and willing to cooperate with others a leader can not be successful. For some obvious reasons I would like to be "mostly agree with the second portion" of the prompt and thereby am obliged to provide necessary viewpoints in defense of my position.
The definition of leader states that - a leader is he who can lead a group of individuals without devaluating its (group's) prerogatives and values. Addressing this definition - the clear characterisitics of a leader has to be able to lead a group of persons without disrespecting and devaluating their primary and cumulative motive. Now, comparing the twofolds paradigm of the leader mentioned in the prompt - it can not be of surity that if a leader is competitive and highly motivated in his pursuation will be accepted unianimously by his fellow person. He might be of high calber or highly ambitious person but without having the support of his fellow people he will not be able to successful leader. In the other hand - without possessing the same talent, and in cases - inferior comapared to the earlier one, a leader can be successful if he or she earns the respect and comity of his fellow people. And the way only to remain faithful, acceptable towards the group is to remain coopearate with his group people. For example - if a leader is pretty bossy and officious towards his employees then his people might not feel comfortable around him. They will always be in constant fear in case they are vitiated by their leader. As a result, although being capable of leading the team in a good professional way - the leader will not gain the acceptance the group, let alone be amicable and aware of their conditions. On the other hand, if the same leader remains humble and expresses his williningness to learn even from the younng of the employees and respectful towards other, he will gain the acceptance of the employees and in return they will be more cooperative towards their leader, culminating augment the productivity of the team.
Also, the fact - being competitive means to culture necessary qualities important to be successful in respective fields or to grow continously to remain alive in the competition. Supposedly, in the filed of everything it is always good to be competitive and to be able to grow. But what is necessity for a leader to run a successful team of people is to gain the acceptance, which is not dependable upon the competitiveness of the leader. For example - a leader can be highly competitive becasue of his enriched knowledge in his fields or becasue of his highly ambitious aim or becasue of his being highly motivated to take his team to the zeneith. But does that confirm his acceptance among the people of that team? Might be the case that the leader is very happy and well pursuited with his ambition but many of his followers are not feeling the same becasue of theri problems, could be personal or social or economical or anything related. Now if he is a good leader, except from being highly competitive, he will ask those followers of his about their predicament. Thus, he can gain the acceptance of those people and come closer towards those people. This will help him to learn about his fellow people - significantly important for the long term growth of the group. Without being empathetic and solely unidimensional in his aim, one can not be a leader, let alone be a good one. It is becasue there are numerous people having the same skill if not better than the respective leaders, but all of them can not gain the acceptance of their people and so could not lead their team.
Counterintuitive prospect can be that - without being competitive a leader can not also gain the lift he needed to be successful. For example - if a leader is very much friendly and amicable towards his fellow peole and that is why people under him have taken him for granted. If this happenes, then the working environment of the team might be hampered as people will start to languish and will not do their respective duties dilligently. For which the group will suffer. Being competitive - the leader will be able to discern the limit within how much he should be cooperative towards his fellow persons. He will handle the group of people more convincingly - not by hyperboel and not by excessive adulation. Withput gainning the competence and the urge to for continous growth the quality of the leader will be deadlock, in return his contribution towards his company will come to a standstill in relative future. Thay is why it is also pretty important for a leader to remain competitive, not without being cooperative though, to be successful in his respective field.
So, looking at all the viewpoints and factors mentioned above - it will always be the priority for a leader to remain cooperative with his people and also remain competitive enough to grow, but not before the fundamental of more importance - acceptance among the people of the group.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-24 | Technoblade | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-09 | nimagm | 83 | view |
| 2023-04-09 | nimagm | 79 | view |
| 2021-11-22 | allang9501 | 50 | view |
| 2021-10-27 | Lucas13 | 33 | view |
- The following letter is from a group of Linford College alumni to the chair of the art department at the college In a recent survey of college graduates 90 percent agreed that participating in an internship increased their chances of finding a job after g 67
- The following is a memorandum from the office of Mayor Harrison Smith Jones In order to relieve Briggsville s notorious traffic congestion Mayor Harrison Smith Jones plans to build a multi million dollar subway system The subway will run through the major 78
- Fifteen years ago Omega University implemented a new procedure that encouraged students to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of all their professors Since that time Omega professors have begun to assign higher grades in their classes and overall student 65
- The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of Quiot Manufacturing During the past year Quiot Manufacturing had 30 percent more on the job accidents than at the nearby Panoply Industries plant where the work shifts are one hour shorter than our 66
- Some people claim that you can tell whether a nation is great by looking at the achievements of its rulers artists or scientists Others argue that the surest indicator of a great nation is in fact the general welfare of all its people Write a response in 66
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 351, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'twofolds'' or 'twofold's'?
Suggestion: twofolds'; twofold's
...d cumulative motive. Now, comparing the twofolds paradigm of the leader mentioned in the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1514, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to even'
Suggestion: to even
...nd expresses his williningness to learn even from the younng of the employees and re...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, second, so, still, then, thus, well, as to, for example, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 56.0 19.5258426966 287% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 34.0 12.4196629213 274% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 40.0 14.8657303371 269% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 77.0 33.0505617978 233% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 121.0 58.6224719101 206% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 23.0 12.9106741573 178% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 4236.0 2235.4752809 189% => OK
No of words: 874.0 442.535393258 197% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8466819222 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.43723192426 4.55969084622 119% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85233656551 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 318.0 215.323595506 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.363844393593 0.4932671777 74% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1334.7 704.065955056 190% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 33.0 20.2370786517 163% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.8962525138 60.3974514979 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.363636364 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4848484848 23.4991977007 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.27272727273 5.21951772744 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 27.0 10.2758426966 263% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.401051082197 0.243740707755 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146181423199 0.0831039109588 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0816245379217 0.0758088955206 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.286777761708 0.150359130593 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0535296324963 0.0667264976115 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 157.0 100.480337079 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 351, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'twofolds'' or 'twofold's'?
Suggestion: twofolds'; twofold's
...d cumulative motive. Now, comparing the twofolds paradigm of the leader mentioned in the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1514, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to even'
Suggestion: to even
...nd expresses his williningness to learn even from the younng of the employees and re...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, second, so, still, then, thus, well, as to, for example, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 56.0 19.5258426966 287% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 34.0 12.4196629213 274% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 40.0 14.8657303371 269% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 77.0 33.0505617978 233% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 121.0 58.6224719101 206% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 23.0 12.9106741573 178% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 4236.0 2235.4752809 189% => OK
No of words: 874.0 442.535393258 197% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8466819222 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.43723192426 4.55969084622 119% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85233656551 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 318.0 215.323595506 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.363844393593 0.4932671777 74% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1334.7 704.065955056 190% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 33.0 20.2370786517 163% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.8962525138 60.3974514979 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.363636364 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4848484848 23.4991977007 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.27272727273 5.21951772744 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 27.0 10.2758426966 263% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.401051082197 0.243740707755 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146181423199 0.0831039109588 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0816245379217 0.0758088955206 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.286777761708 0.150359130593 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0535296324963 0.0667264976115 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 157.0 100.480337079 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.