Some people argue that successful leaders in government, industry, or other fields must be highly competitive. Others people claim that in order to be successful, a leader must be willing and able to cooperate with others.
Competitiveness and Cooperation's between two or more conglomerate either act as benefit or drawback to whole human kind, it totally depends on the motive of those competitor's. Being competitive help's technology giant's to develop more efficient and best industry standard product's or service's at best possible cost to survive or to be in business. Cooperating can also be beneficial to conglomerate's or technology giants or even person's by helping each other by using expertise in respective field for mutual benefit's like welfare, donation's and helping poor for education. Cooperation should always be done between any two competitor in most important matter's especially in case of survival like pandemic, politics and many more.
First is the example of Astrazeneca and Pfizer are two conglomerate's of healthcare industry. During, Covid-19 pandemic both competitiveness helped world to get vaccine as early as possible to curtail the bacteria of covid. Each other's vaccine were made by keeping factor's into consideration like geography, cost and especially immune system. Due, to their competitive behaviour we were able to higher efficacy vaccine at cheap and most affordable cost.
Second is the example of Republican's and Democrat's, both are two biggest parties in America's Politics. But, both worked together to solve the debt issue in 2023 to preclude country from getting bankrupt and even saving the job's of the citizen's. They also tried to keep their economy into healthy state for better future and continuous contribution in the world peace and affairs.
Third is the example of Open AI and Google two technology giant's helping human king by implementing artificial intelligence solution's to ease the time consuming task. Competitive behaviour of both the companies help's industry to provide every service or product with highest possible efficacy and introduce new and new product as they progress. Both the companies not only try to provide solution in best possible way but also tries to help human being in their day to day activities.
I do agree with both the statement's but their implementation should take people's need, use and nature into consideration. The competitive helps in getting best of possible thing and co-operation helps in extant the unstable situation.
Hence, both are important in respective domain's.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-10 | wopona8219 | 83 | view |
| 2023-09-10 | wopona8219 | 83 | view |
| 2023-09-10 | wopona8219 | 83 | view |
| 2023-09-10 | wopona8219 | 83 | view |
| 2023-09-10 | wopona8219 | 83 | view |
- Government officials should rely on their own judgement rather than unquestionably carry out the will of the people they serve 50
- The best way to understand the character of the society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models 66
- Students should always question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively 54
- People s behaviour is largely determined by forces not of their own making 66
- All parents should be required to volunteer time to their children s schools 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 228, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
... to curtail the bacteria of covid. Each others vaccine were made by keeping factors in...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 262, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the highest'.
Suggestion: with the highest
...try to provide every service or product with highest possible efficacy and introduce new and...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 397, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'in the best'.
Suggestion: in the best
...panies not only try to provide solution in best possible way but also tries to help hum...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 11.3162921348 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 33.0505617978 30% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1976.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 366.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39890710383 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97138653256 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571038251366 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 637.2 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3345160419 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.235294118 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5294117647 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.70588235294 5.21951772744 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135116245986 0.243740707755 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0391783002823 0.0831039109588 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411995428648 0.0758088955206 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.056330258057 0.150359130593 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0561309815002 0.0667264976115 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.8971910112 134% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.