Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.
Art tells the story of a historical society, and over time, art and culture have gone through significant changes under the influence of different kinds of people and institutions. The notion states that some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people, but others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts. While I partially agree with the statement, I believe that there needs to be room for the overall integrity of the art.
First of all, any government runs the country and maintains the laws and orders of the country. In addition, they bear all the expenses of government institutions and officials. In most countries, historical art is preserved by the government, which funds the preservation of the arts. So, the people of the country can see the arts easily with low cost and can learn an ample amount of information about arts and history. For example, the museum is funded by the government and open to the public at a very low ticket cost.
Additionally, the government funds art schools, where a lot of students can learn about arts and crafts and explore different fields of arts that make them more competent artists. They can earn at a low cost, and they have access to a large number of good artists in the country as teachers, in addition to historial art. In the future, they can become more competent artists, have a significant impact on the arts, and make the arts flourish.
Moreover, art represents any country's history and culture, so the government must pay attention to this field. Otherwise, the good arts will vanish over time, and history will die. For this reason, the government should open a new department to work with art, improve the art, make new artists, preserve it, and present it to the public. Art is a good kind of entertainment, and the government should open a new art gallery to make the art available to the people of the country.
However, when the government is dictative, they control the project and narrative of the arts, and this creates a closed environment for the artist to grow. Artists are creative, and they need space to show their creative skillset, but because of the dictatorship, the situation will be worse. The art and artist will not fade and grow over time. Besides the government, any private or individual needs to pay attention to the art and make art schools and art galas for the society. Moreover, art pieces have a lot of financial value, and they can be sold in the art market.
In conclusion, government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish, but besides government funding, private funding is also needed to flourish the field and make a significant change in the art sector that will provide significant art peace that will tell the history of present times to future generations.
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts 66
- Competition for high grades seriously limits the quality of learning at all levels of education Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In deve 66
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student s field of study Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 66
- In order for any work of art for example a film a novel a poem or a song to have merit it must be understandable to most people 60
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 234, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... at a low cost, and they have access to a large number of good artists in the country as teachers...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, while, as for, for example, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 31.0 14.8657303371 209% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 26.0 12.9106741573 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2431.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 504.0 442.535393258 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82341269841 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73813722054 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66868472274 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.430555555556 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 739.8 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 12.0 1.77640449438 676% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.5495302273 60.3974514979 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.761904762 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2380952381 5.21951772744 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.634075506527 0.243740707755 260% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.213953763473 0.0831039109588 257% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.182733511299 0.0758088955206 241% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.394024988356 0.150359130593 262% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.156698621384 0.0667264976115 235% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.