Some people believe that success in creative fields, such as painting, fiction writing, andfilmmaking, primarily requires hard work and perseverance. Others believe that suchsuccess mainly requires innate talents that cannot be learned.

Essay topics:

Some people believe that success in creative fields, such as painting, fiction writing, and

filmmaking, primarily requires hard work and perseverance. Others believe that such

success mainly requires innate talents that cannot be learned.

This topic raises the issue of whether renowned artists are inherently brilliant or if the reasons for their sucess lie in their ability to be self-disciplined and determined. Indisputably, becoming a respected artist requires distinguish features that can be hardly be acquired by any person on earth. Nevertheless, if all artists are gifted with a peticular sensitivy, communicative skills and a talent for building aesthetics, the root of first-plan artists sucess consists in their hard work. After weighing the evidence, it is certain that provided a person is gifted with artistic skills, this person will be well-respected in a given creative field depending on the efforts it would have manifested towards creation.

First of all, good art do not only rely on sensitivity but also on technical abilities that are anything but inherent in humans. To illustrate, let us look at the example of filmmaking. A director should puts forward an ability to mix between various formats, from music to scenery, so when they become interwined, they produce a coherent feelings in the audience. In this circumstance, obviously having a penchant for one of those formats would not enable in any manner to be a good director : directors learn with experience to balance between these aspects and bring about an equilibrium, given the context of the scenario. Stanley Kubrick best exemplifies this property of filmmaking : his inherent genius notwitstanding, Stanley Kubrick would be a hard-working person that pushed actors to the maximum, to the point of traumatizing some of the actors he directed.

Furthermore, success in a creative field does not depend solely on the quality of a given piece of arts, but also on the ability to convince the tenants of the creative field of its quality, to sell this piece of arts. Specifically, it took years and perseverance to even high-achieving writers to be published : j.k rowling's Harry Poter chef-d'oeuvre for example was rejected from many editors. The same could be said of many tremendous paintors who were unknown during their lifetime : Van Gogh struggled with mental problems that prevented him from efficiently sell his paintings.

Admittedly, there is a motif in some creative fields that presents the artistic expression as a gift of god. This is true espacially when it comes to poetry : french romantist poets presented their arts as inspired by a divine source. However, the above arguent does not constitute a sufficient support to claim that these artists were not hard working. They could be only partially agreeing with this divine source.

Ultimately, after considering both sides of the issue, it must be concluded that success in creative fields lies predominantly in hard work and resilience.

Votes
Average: 8.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-11-24 htidjani 83 view
2019-10-30 Kyunghwan Kim 75 view
2019-10-28 Nafisa Ali Anika 50 view
2019-10-28 samya97 83 view
2019-10-07 moomin1 58 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user samya97 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 340, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'feeling'?
Suggestion: feeling
...ome interwined, they produce a coherent feelings in the audience. In this circumstance, ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 838, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...e maximum, to the point of traumatizing some of the actors he directed. Furthermore, s...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, well, for example, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2327.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 441.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27664399093 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0160451228 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 215.323595506 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578231292517 0.4932671777 117% => OK
syllable_count: 713.7 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.0776197058 60.3974514979 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.882352941 118.986275619 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9411764706 23.4991977007 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.82352941176 5.21951772744 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118767638996 0.243740707755 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0393073826326 0.0831039109588 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390902215187 0.0758088955206 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0737848388128 0.150359130593 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325609389595 0.0667264976115 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 14.1392134831 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.38706741573 115% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 100.480337079 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.