Students should always question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing an

Essay topics:

Students should always question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

The classroom has become the center of teaching and learning for a decade. Teachers teach in the classroom, and students take notes, perform some activities, appear in exams, and learn about the subject in a friendly environment. I partly disagree with the statement that students should always question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively.
Students can ask questions about an obscure theory that the teacher is teaching in the classroom, but students do have not enough knowledge about the topic so all the questions may not be valid for this particular topic. So I prefer a friendly environment for a better teaching-learning process.

Firstly, the teacher tries to teach their best in the classroom, and they present a lot of examples in the classroom to make it understandable in the class. Teacher teach a particular topic in the classroom that are included in the syllabus and ordered by the academic curriculum. All students in the classroom are not the same incompatible and smart to ask a question. Only incompatible students can ask questions freely and smartly, but students don’t know the topic properly so they can ask irrelevant questions that will disturb the classroom environment and hinder the class.

But all teachers are not good and friendly, they reprimand the students when they ask a question, which fosters fear among students. Students can’t learn properly from this kind of teacher and feel bad about themselves and do poorly in the exam. If students accept what is taught in the classroom passively no critical-thinking, innovative ideas will not generated among the students and the main purpose of education will not be achieved. Students will not be able to implement knowledge from the classroom to their practical life and the main purpose of education will be diminutive.

In conclusion, I prefer a middle ground in the classroom where students will ask questions about the topic if they are unable to learn from the class and the teacher must be responsible to reply about the question, but the question must be relevant and topic-oriented otherwise the question will distract all students and make a negative environment in the class room.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-02-12 Tammy__kk 66 view
2023-10-20 fstamim 50 view
2023-09-29 Isolus 75 view
2023-09-19 shekhar 66 view
2023-04-03 arnav98 66 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user fstamim :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 166, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'teaches'.
Suggestion: teaches
...it understandable in the class. Teacher teach a particular topic in the classroom tha...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 356, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'generate'
Suggestion: generate
...cal-thinking, innovative ideas will not generated among the students and the main purpose...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, so, in conclusion, kind of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1852.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 360.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14444444444 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93181779031 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 215.323595506 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.430555555556 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 540.9 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.6302122995 60.3974514979 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.285714286 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7142857143 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170367206708 0.243740707755 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0781755203833 0.0831039109588 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0898385957424 0.0758088955206 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116600621544 0.150359130593 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0550949427083 0.0667264976115 83% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 100.480337079 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.