Teachers’ salaries should be based on their students’ academic performance.
Teachers have a very important job because they are a model to be followed by their students with their performance. In fact, their job is more complex than teaching, which is educating. The prompt recommends that teachers should be paid based on their students’ academic performance. In my opinion, I disagree with this suggestion and argue that there are other ways to judge teachers’ performance and their salary should not be affected by that.
Firstly, teaching and learning is a very complex process that requires lots of dedication and time. Thus, a teacher should be evaluated based on performance of both sides and salary should not be affected. Different areas are populated from people that put varied efforts in education. For example, in a city where criminality and other social problems are present, teachers’ job and salary depend on many factors beside academic performance of students. Therefore, the educators are going to face additional problems with groups of population that have other than education issues, like economic or social ones. However, teachers should not work for just a paycheck, but for a great mission which is the education of new generations. The above example illustrates that education stands on more bases, other than a salary.
Further, even if we assume that getting paid based on students’ academic performance will make educators perform better, they should still be evaluated by other criteria and appreciated for their efforts. For example, a teacher that gets a thank you note on his /her cubby starts the school day performing better than other days. Research has shown that emotional reward has a greater impact on the way teachers perform. In other words, trust and respect should be dedicated to these people that work hard on educating and helping students flourish in their life. Thus, governments should dedicate more time to the qualification of educators and offer different research based methods to help them perform the best.
In conclusion, some agree that teachers need to perform and be evaluated based on students’ performance and this should not affect their salary. However, isn’t that precisely why we should appreciate them and the government evaluates their efforts and performance? If we do so, we’re likely to get the best out of them. A country that respects teachers, respects education and is more likely to develop
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-26 | Oladelejnrr | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-26 | Oladelejnrr | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-24 | raghavchauhan619 | 62 | view |
| 2023-10-04 | sahil nain | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-01 | Free | 66 | view |
- Teachers salaries should be based on their students academic performance 66
- As we acquire more knowledge things do not become more comprehensible but more complex and mysterious 50
- Society should identify those children who have special talents and provide training for them early age to develop their talents 50
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 238, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...forts. For example, a teacher that gets a thank you note on his /her cubby starts the s...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 159, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... not affect their salary. However, isn’t that precisely why we should appreciate ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, so, still, therefore, thus, for example, in conclusion, in fact, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2025.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 387.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23255813953 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73867191026 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514211886305 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 619.2 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.5980052662 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.25 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.35 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 5.21951772744 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.548631206188 0.243740707755 225% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.175331047879 0.0831039109588 211% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.174587023281 0.0758088955206 230% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.37717906284 0.150359130593 251% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107952878185 0.0667264976115 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 238, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...forts. For example, a teacher that gets a thank you note on his /her cubby starts the s...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 159, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... not affect their salary. However, isn’t that precisely why we should appreciate ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, so, still, therefore, thus, for example, in conclusion, in fact, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2025.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 387.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23255813953 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73867191026 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514211886305 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 619.2 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.5980052662 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.25 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.35 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 5.21951772744 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.548631206188 0.243740707755 225% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.175331047879 0.0831039109588 211% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.174587023281 0.0758088955206 230% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.37717906284 0.150359130593 251% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107952878185 0.0667264976115 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.