Those who see their ideas through, regardless of doubts or criticism others may express, are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy.
Self belief or self-confidence is always appreciated, but there is a thin layer between confidence and over-confidence. However, I agree that a final decision should be taken by an individual, yet, positive criticism and doubts can improve the ideas and restrict future problems. Author laid his thesis based on an assumptions which we can be oppose with evidences.
To counter author's assumption, we can take an example of many past autocratic rulers or leaders leading their kingdom, where nobody else was supposed to speak or criticize in any means. Yes, they also left with lasting legacy but no one remember them as a good example. Hitler, is one of them, because, of his ideas and thoughts thousands of people has to suffer and still they are suffering. Likewise, there are many other leaders who destroyed humanity thinking that their thought are right.
Criticism are always appreciated, and can be helpful in identifying anomaly. In contrast to the author's thesis, let's take another example of any product which has been designed or manufactured by an individual per his ideas, and then marketed the product. However, comments from the end user was not satisfactory, and it gets fail. Reason for the failure could be anything, but stakeholder assessment must be one of the reason. Again with this evidence, the author presumption can be challenged.
Being suspicious is another things, but still doubts are a first step towards the solution. Brain storming is an essential tool to find the pros and cons, where each people, as per their level of understanding, can give his or her views and that can be an add-on towards the success of a particular idea. Doubts and criticism are used to find the flaws in anyone's' ideas, no one is perfect, and chances of improvements are always there.
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership. 58
- Paleo diets, in which one eats how early hominids (human ancestors) did, are becoming increasingly popular. Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food, especially bone broth, a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours. They 26
- Read our sample essays and explanations for why each deserves its score, then assign yourself a score. 16
- The city of Winston has two large department stores: Namen and Roscoe. Namen is known for its high-end designer fashions, while Roscoe is known for more affordable fashion options. Both Namen and Roscoe are each considering opening another store in the gr 39
- Undergraduate students majoring in Business or in the Sciences should not be required to take any courses in the Humanities since those courses won’t benefit their future careers. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 313, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an assumption' or simply 'assumptions'?
Suggestion: an assumption; assumptions
...oblems. Author laid his thesis based on an assumptions which we can be oppose with evidences. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 12, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
... oppose with evidences. To counter authors assumption, we can take an example of m...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 97, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...identifying anomaly. In contrast to the authors thesis, lets take another example of an...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, likewise, so, still, then, another thing, as to, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 58.6224719101 51% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1510.0 2235.4752809 68% => OK
No of words: 300.0 442.535393258 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03333333333 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82122116979 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.4932671777 122% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 704.065955056 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8738595926 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.666666667 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.13333333333 5.21951772744 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131977583268 0.243740707755 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0449516365061 0.0831039109588 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0439504916458 0.0758088955206 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0811304776369 0.150359130593 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.049766279586 0.0667264976115 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 100.480337079 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.