Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership.

Essay topics:

Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership.

Past should not be the reason to mourn in present, but, learning from the incidents happen and avoiding repetition of same is what needs to be valued. Therefore, i totally disagree with the statement here. Understanding the past is always more useful, and when leadership is concerned, not only yours but other's experience also matters.

To support my point of view, I would like to highlight some of the main roles in our societies, and how past experiences can help them to shine.

Lets take an example of Project Manager, who is working on some unprecedented project. However, the project activities, at the ground level, are somewhere similar to the precedent projects. The mistakes, which has been made during the execution of the past projects can be very helpful to avoid future endeavors. Making it lucid, lets take an example, costing of fencing was under budgeted in the earlier project, therefore, the management has to cut their profits and feed in the money to completed the project on time, and saving their company reputation. Same as like costing, all other aspects of past should be analyzed to avoid repetition in present. Therefore, in project management professionals, lesson learned documents are the key document of Project management plan.

Let's broaden our analysis and move to countries' leaderships. For the leader, who is currently holding a supreme place and responsible for leading the country, can be benefited by the earlier leaders' activities. He can prepare his dos and don'ts list. Which can help him and his nation in every mean. History is overloaded with those kingdoms which had been destroyed because of common mistakes. And there egotist nature were not able to learn the lesson from their past.

My last point will be related with the student, who wants to attempt GRE exams. He must go through the past experiences of other candidates to understand the dos and don'ts for this exam. Moreover, after every mock test he should get back to the answers' explanation to understand his mistakes to avoid doing same during the test.

In precisely, what had happened in the past always gives you another chance to improve the mistakes and enjoy the present by avoiding the same.

Votes
Average: 5.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-14 bstergios55@yahoo.com 83 view
2019-11-30 zzk81 50 view
2019-11-26 Venkateshwar 50 view
2019-11-24 OliverRaab 66 view
2019-11-23 ken10091995 50 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user aliabbassamie :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 56, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...oint of view, I would like to highlight some of the main roles in our societies, and how pa...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 105, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...he main roles in our societies, and how past experiences can help them to shine. Lets take an ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...t experiences can help them to shine. Lets take an example of Project Manager, who...
^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...cument of Project management plan. Lets broaden our analysis and move to countr...
^^^^
Line 15, column 104, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...tempt GRE exams. He must go through the past experiences of other candidates to understand the d...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 246, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'answers'' or 'answer's'?
Suggestion: answers'; answer's
...ery mock test he should get back to the answers explanation to understand his mistakes ...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, moreover, so, therefore, as to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1862.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 369.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0460704607 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65124044051 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579945799458 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 568.8 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.2823940608 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.45 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.21951772744 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125403892525 0.243740707755 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0353013267418 0.0831039109588 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0422888552665 0.0758088955206 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0661397803744 0.150359130593 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322906242676 0.0667264976115 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.