"Truly innovative ideas tend to come from individuals, because groups tend to work towards consensus and the status quo.”
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Individuals possess a unique capacity for innovative thinking. The human brain, an immensely intricate organ, harbors the potential for groundbreaking ideas. The 80/20 rule, suggesting that a small percentage of efforts often yield a majority of results, supports the notion that individual brilliance can lead to remarkable innovation. Historical examples further reinforce this idea, with luminaries like Isaac Newton and Albert Einstein making monumental contributions to humanity as individuals.
Consider, for instance, the case of Kwame Nkrumah's innovative approach to Ghana's independence. While initial efforts by Paa Grant and Obetsebi Lamptey focused on expedited independence without tangible progress, Nkrumah's individual initiative of rallying Ghanaians and advocating for "independence now" led to the country gaining independence in just two years. Similarly, Elon Musk's individual ingenuity challenged established norms in space travel and engineering, resulting in the development of reusable spaceships that significantly reduced the cost of space exploration.
However, it is crucial to acknowledge that groups, under certain conditions, can foster innovation. Collaborative efforts bring together diverse perspectives and expertise, creating a fertile ground for creativity. The rapid development of the COVID-19 vaccine is a testament to the power of group collaboration. While an individual scientist's groundwork laid the foundation, it was the coordinated effort of a research group that accelerated the vaccine's development, showcasing the efficacy of group innovation in addressing global challenges.
In conclusion, both individuals and groups play pivotal roles in fostering innovation. While individuals may excel in pushing the boundaries of conventional thinking, groups harness collective intelligence to address complex problems efficiently. The key lies in recognizing the strengths of both approaches and leveraging them appropriately. By doing so, societies can capitalize on the full spectrum of human creativity, ensuring a dynamic and innovative future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-25 | Jhon Kwame | 66 | view |
| 2023-11-25 | Jhon Kwame | 66 | view |
- We venerate loyalty to our schools employers instituitions friends as a virtue Loyalty however can be at least as detrimental an influence as it can be a beneficial one Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with t 70
- We venerate loyalty to our schools employers instituitions friends as a virtue Loyalty however can be at least as detrimental an influence as it can be a beneficial one Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with t 50
- Truly innovative ideas tend to come from individuals because groups tend to work towards consensus and the status quo Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 66
- The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers artists or scientists but by the general welfare of its people Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement a 50
- Truly innovative ideas tend to come from individuals because groups tend to work towards consensus and the status quo Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 334, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'scientists'' or 'scientist's'?
Suggestion: scientists'; scientist's
...roup collaboration. While an individual scientists groundwork laid the foundation, it was ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 448, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'vaccines'' or 'vaccine's'?
Suggestion: vaccines'; vaccine's
...f a research group that accelerated the vaccines development, showcasing the efficacy of...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, similarly, so, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 19.5258426966 15% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 33.0505617978 27% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1822.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 288.0 442.535393258 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.32638888889 5.05705443957 125% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.43220692373 2.79657885939 123% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.677083333333 0.4932671777 137% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.59117977528 126% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 60.2935780623 60.3974514979 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.466666667 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109923359086 0.243740707755 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0361672286853 0.0831039109588 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0272483465213 0.0758088955206 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0638394950064 0.150359130593 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0113136192963 0.0667264976115 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 14.1392134831 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 18.35 48.8420337079 38% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.1743820225 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 19.43 12.1639044944 160% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.87 8.38706741573 142% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 100.480337079 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.