Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership.
The statement is very blatant in its meaning. It disregards any benefits that a current leader could acquire by understanding the past. I strongly disagree with the statement as it undermines a very vital part of leadership. Understanding the past of the company or the management of an institution is of prime importance in enabling the current leader to function efficiently. The following passages will further reinforce my position on the issue.
Leadership is all about understanding the capabilities of the team members and finding a way to utilize their potential. A leader who fails to do so is not regarded as one of the best. It's upon the leader to successfully coalesce the team members and work efficiently. How does a leader coalesce or bring about the unity amongst the team members? How will a leader understand the strengths and weaknesses of the team members? A detailed understanding of the past of the company or the institution is the foundation on which a leader grows. Suppose, a team has got a new leader who is not interested in learning about the past of how the team used to work would eventually force the members to work in the fields not aligned to their strengths. This will further exacerbate the situation as the team members will bemoan about the injustice and an air of dissatisfaction will prevail. Few of the members might leave the job or the role they were asked to play because of the disinterested leader.
A leader without a prior understanding of the firm or institution will not be able to bring about positive energy amongst the members. No matter how productive or efficient a leader may be, he or she has to have a deeper level of understanding of hor the things work in that particular firm. Every organization has a different method of working and it would be absolutely absurd if a leader tries to force his method of working in every organization he has worked with.
In order to have a great camaraderie amongst the members of the organization, one has to be well aware of the needs and requirements of its employees. Every employee would require a different approach in talking and addressing it can only be taken care of if the leader has an extensive understanding of every bit of the organization. A detailed look at the profile and personal interaction with each of its team members is one of the main pillars upon which a leader stands. The overall functioning of the firm requires prior knowledge of the past records as well.
In a nutshell, understanding the past is absolutely vital for a leader to work efficiently and productively and to bring about positive energy in the atmosphere of the organization.
- Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated 50
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 75
- Men and women due to the differences in their physical strengths are supposed to carry different tasks. 66
- Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs 73
- Claim: In order to help small businesses thrive, government should play a minimalrole in private business matters. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 186, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
... so is not regarded as one of the best. Its upon the leader to successfully coalesc...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, may, so, well, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 58.6224719101 130% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2227.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 460.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84130434783 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6311565067 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05548176383 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.430434782609 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 706.5 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3280061358 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.227272727 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9090909091 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.36363636364 5.21951772744 26% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168372115173 0.243740707755 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0600044867791 0.0831039109588 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643380951327 0.0758088955206 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118393765121 0.150359130593 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0744979965955 0.0667264976115 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.