We can learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own.
When it comes to an issue, different people may have different opinions since everyone view things from different angles. It is very common that we can learn much more from people whose views we share since we share some common beliefs and knowledge. Although many people believe that we can learn from people whose views we share, I strongly believe that there are so much to learn from people whose views contradict our own.
Admittedly, there are things that we can learn from people whose views we share in certain extends. First of all, since people who share views with us, it is very easy for us to accept them without any problem. We are simply more willing to learn from them at the very beginning and communication will be easy with them. Secondly, learning from people whose views we share is more comfortable than whose views contradict. We tend to be more willing to listen to the details from their views and learn from it. Nonetheless, this so-called conclusion has major flaws and I am not able to agree with this statement due to the reasons below.
First and foremost, it is very attracting when we listen to views that comes from a completely different approch. Learning from people whose views contradict our own can refresh our minds with new ideas. We are forced to get outside of our comfort zone and get into a whole new idea. By learning a new view, we are able to learn different ways of thinking and get to know different people’s viewpoint. In this way, it helps us to get inspired. For example, when doing a debate, it is important to learn the ideas given from people who hold different opinions. Once we learned their arguments and understood the way they approch to this issue, we can enhance our argument in order to against them.
Moreover, by learning from people whose views contradict our own, we get to have a more comprehensive understanding for an issue and gain skills. Even though we both discuss the same issue, we are able to learn views from a completely different perspecitve which helps us to look at the issue from different angles. By learning from other views, we are trained to think one issue from both sides. At the same time, listen to someone who holds opposite views, we can build our active listening skills. These skills that we gained from learning opposite views will benefit us from future thinkings.
“Views” is a highly subjective word which means there is no absolutely right views or wrong views. All views should be apprciated. Hence, without any doubt, learning from people who hold different views can inspire us and train us to think comprehensively. Therefore, I believe that we can learn much more from people whose views contradict our own than people whose views we share.
- Instead of requiring students to take courses in a variety of discipline--that is, courses ranging from the arts and the humanities to the physical and biological sciences--colleges and universities should allow students to enroll only in those courses th 50
- For the past five years Mr Charles Schade has been the music director at Steel City High School and during that time the school band from Steel City High has won three regional band competitions In addition the quality of the music rehearsal facilities an 89
- We can learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own. 50
- Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this time period, most of the complaints received from viewers were concerned with our station's coverage of w 42
- Seven years ago homeowners in nearby Brookville community adopted a set of restrictions on how the community s yards should be landscaped and what colors the exteriors of homes should be painted Since then average property values have tripled in Brookvill 64
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 62, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'view'.
Suggestion: view
...it is very attracting when we listen to views that comes from a completely different ...
^^^^^
Line 15, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ill benefit us from future thinkings. 'Views' is a highly subjective...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, look, may, moreover, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 26.0 11.3162921348 230% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 67.0 33.0505617978 203% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2308.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 479.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81837160752 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67825486995 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52685852638 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.415448851775 0.4932671777 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 687.6 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 6.24550561798 288% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.8050562018 60.3974514979 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.32 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.16 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 5.21951772744 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.751557397251 0.243740707755 308% => The coherence between essay topic and essay body is overfitting.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.290027245652 0.0831039109588 349% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.246807220334 0.0758088955206 326% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.566395022265 0.150359130593 377% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110293444252 0.0667264976115 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 14.1392134831 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 48.8420337079 141% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 12.1743820225 68% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.89 8.38706741573 82% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 100.480337079 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.