When old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes, modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
It is known that both modern and antique play crucial role in our society. The development and modernization are also important in architectural aspects in order to preserve safety and health, but the historical and esthetic value of old buildings is ineffable. Therefore, I disagree with the given statement that modern development should precede the conservation of historic buildings.
Old buildings should be preserved when they have historical value. This is extremely important for local residents’ culture maintenance. When we have a historical building preserved we can arrange scholar visits in order to teach local children about their own city history. It is much better to see personally something rather than just in a book photograph. Furthermore, usually these old buildings or other constructions have sentimental values because there are part of peoples’ and families’ own history. For example, in my city the mayor would like to demolish a historic square in order to construct a new road. However, due to the historical value for our city, since this square was there since our colonization time, and sentimental value, since a lot of families’ histories happened there, local residents refute this proposal. And hopefully, Portugal Square remains enchanting our citizens.
The conservation of historical buildings is also accounts for tourism proposes. The esthetic beauty of old buildings is unique and correspond to the era their come from. It is pure history and art classes outside for everybody appreciate and learn without being into a museum. For instance, the Europe is one of the most visited tourism route, and it is mainly due to the high historical value of its places, buildings, churches, squares and monuments. All of them count about their people history and culture.
On the other hand, the only exception for my disagreement would be if this building renovation or even demolish is necessary to guarantee peoples’ safety. When no care or reform is done during many years is expected that some structures deteriorate and then some approach is necessary. For example, a historic old building in my city that used to be a beautiful hotel was abandoned for long years and now the only solution is to demolish because all its structure is compromised. In this case a modern development could be done in order to enhance the local commerce and tourism.
To sum up, I disagree that modern development should precede the conservation of old buildings, since old buildings value are uncountable. They are important to preserve culture, history and enhance economical aspects of a region.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 138, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...r local residents’ culture maintenance. When we have a historical building preserved...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, for example, for instance, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2221.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 420.0 442.535393258 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2880952381 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95672779082 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502380952381 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 707.4 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.8137849622 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.954545455 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0909090909 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36363636364 5.21951772744 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299835096252 0.243740707755 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0922334321597 0.0831039109588 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0800294870601 0.0758088955206 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186605847215 0.150359130593 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562296397154 0.0667264976115 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.