women and men should carry task according to their inherent physical differences
The creations; men and women are wonderfully made with amazing features which distinguish one from the other. These features are genetic, physical, and maybe those developed from environmental impact. It is with no doubt that these differences have molded their individual capabilities towards tasks and various actions which is relative to the inherent and extrinsic features. In support of the claim, the three reasons below clearly explain why men and women are not equally fit for many tasks.
First, in human development, some hormones for example are classified as male hormones; testosterone while others are termed female hormones; progesterone, estrogen. These two hormones are not responsible for bodybuilding, they, however, illustrate that certain hormones are specific to the body formation of both gender and are responsible for certain functions and actions of both individuals. Furthermore, some hormones are responsible for bodybuilding in humans which is more dominant in men than women, that is why an abnormality occurs when a woman has more of such hormones and exhibit men's traits; a deep voice, physical strength, and facial hairs, etc. Body-building hormones naturally cause the ability for men to carry out more strenuous and hardy tasks than a woman.
In addition, asides from inherent physical differences, courtesy, culture, environmental factors are also responsible for the marginalization of tasks to both genders. For example, in Nigeria, it is seen as inappropriate for a lady to lift heavyweight, take a car to a mechanic or even check a faulty generator while a man is in close proximity. This has over time, built the attitude of separating tasks suited for men and others suited for women. On the other hand, it is also not right for a man to shop home groceries or nurse a child. A woman is not only naturally inclined physically to birth and nurse babies but is known to be more meticulous with certain things than the men. That being explained, there is no obvious reason why both genders should be equally fit for the same tasks.
Supporting the claim, gender equality has been a controversial topic over the years. An opposer of the claim might present the case of women and men that have the same physical attributes imposed by nature or acquired; being able to do almost the same thing. To refute it, that case is for less than one percent of the general population in view and does not hold water in determining the suitability for of tasks for men and women as a whole. In conclusion, tasks are relative to certain physical, natural, and environmental traits which tells the capability of a gender to handle.
- The following appeared in the Health section of the Greenhorne Gazette Motilac is a substance that occurs naturally in the human digestive tract Many consumers of dietary supplements containing motilac report significant easing of digestive discomfort aft 63
- When Stanley Park first opened it was the largest most heavily used public park in town It is still the largest park but it is no longer heavily used Video cameras mounted in the park s parking lots last month revealed the park s drop in popularity the re 68
- In any profession business politics education government those in power should step down after five years Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to 83
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies that any 56
- The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 662, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hysical strength, and facial hairs, etc. Body-building hormones naturally cause t...
^^
Line 3, column 781, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...strenuous and hardy tasks than a woman. In addition, asides from inherent physic...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 330, Rule ID: CLOSE_SCRUTINY[1]
Message: Use simply 'proximity'.
Suggestion: proximity
...ck a faulty generator while a man is in close proximity. This has over time, built the attitude...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.4196629213 16% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2226.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 438.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08219178082 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57476223824 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89018372151 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518264840183 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 716.4 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6358349825 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.666666667 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 5.21951772744 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228146410905 0.243740707755 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0699378151563 0.0831039109588 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574782076101 0.0758088955206 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142362562055 0.150359130593 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0316285506614 0.0667264976115 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.