Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems
Nowadays is believed that raising the price of petrol is best method to resolve traffic growth and pollution matter. I completely agree exist big threat consequence of increasing the price of petrol states than the advantages. The largest threat was explosion increased basic daily need in the country
In the one hand, sharply impact for states which increased petrol prices was declined traffic and dipped pollution matter. It because almost all society as customer petrol fuel consider to use private vehicle and ride the public transportation. For example in developed countries like singapore. The cost of purchasing petrol furl is expensive preciously made citizens definitely chosen public transport such as mass rapid transit (MRT) to travel cheaply. As result not occurred growth traffic and no pollution problems arise. It is important cause rising petrol flue price assist country solve problems about increasing traffic and pollution.
On other hand, the back drop from high price of petrol was made community spend money in big amount to obtain basic daily needs. It is due to the goods transported by transportation with expensive petrol fuel affect price of items became more expensive. For instance food material or goods which transported from town to border territory in the village by truck with high price petrol flue had impact at expensive sale price of basic daily needs. Therefore at the moment happened. The dangerous threat came, called crisis monetary. It is no doubt that detrimental to society and country. I do not believe that high cost petrol fuel had higher positive impact than negative. In my opinion the largest impact is unstabilisation economic sector caused by high cost basic daily needs
In conclusion, from where i stand. I not agree with that statement if made petrol fuel price precious was better solution for traffic and pollutions problems in country, in contrast had big drop back than benefit to community economy in present and future
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology 73
- Many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines 56
- The sales made by a coffee shop in an office building an a typical weekday 78
- The GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010 78
- Information about rail transport in four countries in 2017 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 55, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'is the best'.
Suggestion: is the best
...lieved that raising the price of petrol is best method to resolve traffic growth and po...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 20, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: backdrop
...ic and pollution. On other hand, the back drop from high price of petrol was made comm...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 448, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ensive sale price of basic daily needs. Therefore at the moment happened. The dangerous t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 27, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...aily needs In conclusion, from where i stand. I not agree with that statement ...
^
Line 7, column 191, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'dropped'.
Suggestion: dropped
...roblems in country, in contrast had big drop back than benefit to community economy ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, no doubt, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1673.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24451410658 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60596423925 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53605015674 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5440833158 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4117647059 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7647058824 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23529411765 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336664232861 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106528855401 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107185414108 0.0667982634062 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227991581784 0.151304729494 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0928980635603 0.056905535591 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.