bar chart
The given bar chart provides data on the proportion of a large number of people donating money to charity in different age groups in Britain in the year 1990 and 2010.
It can be seen that a major of 36-50 age group could be observed in 1990 while 51-65 year old adults represented the greatest proportion of people giving money to charity in 2010.
First of all, the figure was highest in 36-50 people at around 42% , nearly three times the number of people aged 18-25 (over 15%) in 1990. Around 35% of 51-65 year old people donated money to charity in the same year, followed by 26-35 and over 65 age groups with slightly over 30% in 1990.
In 2010, the rate of British people aged 51-65 reached a peak at nearly 40%. The figure of British people aged 36-50 and over 65 giving money to charity accounted for 35%, followed by the percentage of people aged 26-35 at around 25% . However, interestingly, there was just over 5% of people aged 18-25 donating money to charity in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-26 | unstoppable | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | bassmodulators123 | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-09 | Helen L | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-09 | Helen L | 67 | view |
| 2024-05-05 | linhlinh123 | 70 | view |
- It is believed that people should work for the same organization during their work lives. Others believed that people should work for different organizations. Discuss both sides. 73
- The bar chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- It is believed that people should work for the same organization during their work lives. Others believed that people should work for different organizations. Discuss both sides. 67
- bar chart 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 56, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...hart provides data on the proportion of a large number of people donating money to charity in dif...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 67, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...as highest in 36-50 people at around 42% , nearly three times the number of people...
^^
Line 5, column 129, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the number of people aged 18-25 over 15% in 1990. Around 35% of 51-65 year old p...
^^
Line 5, column 150, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aged 18-25 over 15% in 1990. Around 35% of 51-65 year old people donated money t...
^^
Line 7, column 106, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nearly 40%. The figure of British people aged 36-50 and over 65 giving money to c...
^^
Line 7, column 235, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ntage of people aged 26-35 at around 25% . However, interestingly, there was just ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, while, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 808.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.51396648045 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.19914488155 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491620111732 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 226.8 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4176034693 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.428571429 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5714285714 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0466118298099 0.215688989381 22% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0338695976835 0.103423049105 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0829632321179 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0592717959461 0.15604864568 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102661762035 0.0819641961636 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.82 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 22.0 40.7170731707 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.