The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and comparisons where relevant.

The bar graph demonstrates that the division of different age groups between men and women in Australia who participate in physical activity in 2010. Overall, men had a higher rate than women in group 15 to 24. However, from 25 to 65 and over there was a considerable change in women level.

The men in 15 to 24 were more dynamic than women in the same period with 52.8 % belonged to men and 47.7% saw by women. Meanwhile, the proportion of women rapidly upward more than men around 10 % between 25 and 64 years old; specifically, in group 25 to 34 the women reached 48.9% and men were 42.2%. Additionally, about 35 to 44 the women kept on boosting with 52.5% as opposed to men slightly decrease with 39.5%. Regarding 45 to 54 the level of women comprised of 53.3% and had a slowly fall 53% in 55 to 64 whereas men in both groups had a small raise with 43.1% and 45.1%, respectively. In the oldest group, there was a plunge in women’s scale which was 47.1% compared to men was 46.7%.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-10-15 Rikaku 78 view
Essays by user Rikaku :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 482, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slowly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('fall') instead of another adjective.
...vel of women comprised of 53.3% and had a slowly fall 53% in 55 to 64 whereas men in both gro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 809.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.42076502732 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58221144061 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590163934426 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 226.8 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2957814169 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.125 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207404681325 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105725032097 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0887854392861 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198750206084 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0655144775022 0.0819641961636 80% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.98 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.65 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.