The bar chart below shows the percentage of government spending on roads and transport in 4 countries in the years 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005.
The bar chart compares four different nations, namely Italia, Portugal, the UK, the USA, in terms of the proportion of government expenditure on road and transport every five years between 1990 and 2005.
Looking at the graph, it is immediately obvious that three of the four countries experienced a decrease in the amount of money spent on streets and transportation in which Portugal dropped the most, the opposite was true for the USA.
In 1990, Portugal was the most country spending expended on route and transport at more than 27%, followed by Italia about 22% and the UK around 10%. In 1995, all three areas continued to reduce the expense by among 1-3%. However, while the quantity of cash disbursing roads and transportation in Portugal went down approximately 23%, the other two countries increased to nearly 24% in Italia and about 12% in the UK but that also was the only growth. In the last year of the survey, the number of money spending on transport infrastructure in Portugal, Italia and the UK fell down 20%, almost 19% and around 8%, respectively.
Regarding the USA, the expenses related to the construction of transport facilities decreased slightly to 10% in 1995 before the figures rose half to 15% in 2005.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-28 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-28 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-28 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 73 | view |
| 2019-02-12 | yaldaasgari | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the production levels of main fuels in a European country from 1981 to 2000 84
- The tables below show results of a survey of urban residents opinions related to various aspects of life in 1980 and 2010 89
- Some cities have few controls over the design and construction of housing and office buildings People think that they should be free to choose the design they like Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- There are more workers to work from home and more students to study from home This is because computer technology is more accessible and cheaper Do you think it is a positive or negative development 89
- Some people claim that public museums and art galleries will be no longer necessary because people can see historical objects and works of art by using a computer Do you agree or disagree 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, regarding, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1031.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93301435407 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78131629558 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602870813397 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.718626495 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.285714286 112.824112599 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8571428571 22.9334400587 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26821460372 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115157120349 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072082892386 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152440173515 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0834136937642 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.91 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.