The bar chart below shows the percentage of government spending on roads and transport in 4 countries in the years 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005.

Essay topics:

The bar chart below shows the percentage of government spending on roads and transport in 4 countries in the years 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005.

The given bar chart provides some information about the amount of budget that is allocated to roads in four different countries over a 15 years period, from 1990 to 2005. An overall view indicates that in European countries more money is spend on roads, while in the UK and the USA, the devoted money is approximately half of them.

As can be seen, the percentage of money showed fluctuation, however, allocated budget has declined over mentioned years. In 1990, about 22 per cent of national budget has been devoted to road, but this money has reduced to less than 20 per cent in 2005.

On the other hand, in Portugal, the amount of spend money experienced a downward trend and from 27 per cent in 1990 has reached 20 per cent in 2005.Although, in the UK, the proportion of money showed one increase in 2000, but it has dropped to approximately 7 per cent in 2005, which means 3 per cent reduction.

It is noteworthy that the USA is the only country that increased the amount of money spending on road. As it is viable, it fell up by 5 per cent in comparison to 1990.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-28 Nguyen Manh Dung 84 view
2019-12-28 Nguyen Manh Dung 84 view
2019-12-28 Nguyen Manh Dung 73 view
2019-02-12 yaldaasgari 73 view
Essays by user yaldaasgari :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 239, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'spent'.
Suggestion: spent
...hat in European countries more money is spend on roads, while in the UK and the USA, ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 149, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Although
...in 1990 has reached 20 per cent in 2005.Although, in the UK, the proportion of money sho...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 884.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51020408163 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62471116596 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545918367347 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.0297674841 43.030603864 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.285714286 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229296144881 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11251978107 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0635272487586 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149613409181 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454020107969 0.0819641961636 55% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.