The bar chart below shows the percentage of students who passed their high school competency exams, by subject and gender, during the period 2010-2011.
The bar chart depicts that the figure who clear the high school competitive exam by gender and subject in the period of 2010 to 2011.
It is clear that, almost all subjects had high figure for girls except geography, in which the number was higher for male. The highest number of girls complete the competitive exam in subject of computer science.
As the graph shows, the trend represented the figure for girls higher compared to boys in all subject. Only 42.1% boys passed computer science while 56.3% cleared this subject that was the highest figure over the period as well as overall the subject. In terms of chemistry, the number for girls at 30.2%were nearly double than boys at 14.1%.
According to physics, history, foreign language and maths, there was slight higher number for girls at 36.7%, 25.6%, 47.4% and 49.2% in compare to for boys at 34.6%, 22.9%, 46.8 and 48.4% respectively in 2010-11. Meantime, reference to subject of geography, the number of male students who cleared the exam stood at 30.4% which only 20.1% was accounted for girls. This subject was only considered in which the trend showed reverse compare to other subjects.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | dolzoo | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | Kien Vu | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-26 | Sharan Kaur | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-11 | dhavaljo15 | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-16 | raminghorbanii | 61 | view |
- Although more and more people read the news on internet, newspapers will remain the most important source of news for the majority of people. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- The table below gives information about UK independent films 50
- The table below gives information about UK independent films. 11
- It is better for college students to live far away from home than live at home with their parents. Do you agree or disagree 73
- The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 965.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94871794872 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28654699775 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523076923077 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7833329249 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.222222222 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.55555555556 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177229699033 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0940464284963 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121578410351 0.0843802449381 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162039871333 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.152318700357 0.0819641961636 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.