The bar chart below shows the percentage of students who passed their high school competency exams, by subject and gender, during the period 2010-2011.
*includes French, German and Spanish
this bar chart provides information on pupils who cleared his/her exam in high school by subject from period 2010-2011.
Overall, in the bar chart, the female is compared to male performance-wise result higher than male. but in one subject male achieved the highest percentage from all subject.
In order to, in physics subject the boyz considered 34.6% while girls slightly rose 36.7%. Chemistry subject the male are accounted for 14.1% while girls are 30.2%. In history subject male are 21.1% got while female received 25.6%. However, in geography subject boyz beat to girls in one subject with respectively 30.4% and 20.1%.
In foreign subject can see that on bar chart only 1% made a difference between them. The same situation happened in mathematics about 1.05% difference made up. Last but not least in final subject computer science girls broke the record with 60% in this subject while boyz are 42.1% got.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | dolzoo | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | Kien Vu | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-26 | Sharan Kaur | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-11 | dhavaljo15 | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-16 | raminghorbanii | 61 | view |
- Buying things on the Internet, such as books, air tickets and groceries, is becoming more and more popular.Do the advantages of shopping in this way outweigh the disadvantages? 67
- Some countries encourage children to do paid work. What are the advantages and disadvantages? 61
- cement production 61
- airport visitors 56
- This pie chart provides information gave by teacher in Britain country for purpose of student learning Second chart illustrates many masters felt a recent happened in the reason 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
this bar chart provides information on pupil...
^^^^
Line 3, column 101, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...rformance-wise result higher than male. but in one subject male achieved the highes...
^^^
Line 5, column 314, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o girls in one subject with respectively 30.4% and 20.1%. In foreign subject ca...
^^
Line 7, column 113, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...etween them. The same situation happened in mathematics about 1.05% difference ma...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 770.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09933774834 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48673512571 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.649006622517 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 219.6 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.2675893666 43.030603864 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.0 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.3 5.23603664747 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186126509866 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0781940241215 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0765720506377 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136498391291 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0884544574715 0.0819641961636 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.