The bar chart shows the divorce rate into European countries from 2011 to 2015
The designed bar histogram beneath proclaims the enlightenment of divorce rates for 5 years in Finland and Sweden.
It is perceptible from the stated bar chart that in the year 2011 the rate of divorce in Finland is nearly 38% where as in Sweden that is about 44%. In the next year, divorce rate went up rapidly in Sweden by 5 percent and in peer country steady decline is observed almost of 2%.
However, from the year 2013 to 2014 a gradual reduction in divorce rate is observed in Sweden and vice versa in Finland. Finally, in 2015 it is nearly 35% and 42% in two European countries.
Overall, we can obivious from the given chart that onward 2013, a dramatic rise in divorce rate in Finland where as Sweden marked drop in that group constantly.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-11-10 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
2024-11-10 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view |
- Some people think that there are benefits in going to private Secondary School. Feels that private Secondary Schools have negative on the society as a whole. Discuss both the points. 78
- The diagram shows how paper is made from trees 75
- With the increasing use and development of new technology, many machines are not able to do the work which people use to perform.What are the advantages and disadvantages of this Trend?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from yo 61
- There are social, medical and technical problems associated with the use of mobile phones. What forms do they take. Do you agree that the problems outweigh the benefits of mobile phones? 78
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 112, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...ate of divorce in Finland is nearly 38% where as in Sweden that is about 44%. In the nex...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 108, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...ramatic rise in divorce rate in Finland where as Sweden marked drop in that group consta...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 622.0 965.302439024 64% => OK
No of words: 136.0 196.424390244 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.57352941176 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.41495297035 3.73543355544 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41619929458 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 78.0 106.607317073 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573529411765 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 181.8 283.868780488 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.3181779031 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.666666667 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336831263383 0.215688989381 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166852060581 0.103423049105 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0593481673335 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199314427056 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0553421622145 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.