Causes of Worldwide Land Degradation

The chart below shows how much land is degraded by four different agricultural activities in North America Europe and Oceania and the table below shows how much of this land is degraded by the four agricultural activities, the data depicted in the given pie chart is calibrated in percentage.
The highest percentage of land got degraded in Europe and the least percentage of the land got degraded by North America while considering pie chart over-grazing cause the most degradation while other factors affected the least to the land degradation.
Moving further deforestation affected Europe by more than about 9 percentage North America, while Oceania had only 1.7 percentage of deforestation furthermore over-cultivation affected Europe the most about 4.4 percentage more than North America while there was no over-cultivation in Oceania however Oceania dominated in over-grazing with almost double the percentage of Europe leaving North America to the bottom which consists of 1.5 percentage.
It can be clearly seen that there is a fivefold increase in over-grazing whereas there is a threefold increase in over-cultivation and more than about a quarter increase in deforestation as compared to other factors.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 84, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'America' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'Americas'.
Suggestion: Americas
...e by more than about 9 percentage North America, while Oceania had only 1.7 percentage ...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1032.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48936170213 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24403551308 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.462765957447 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 337.5 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 47.0 22.4926829268 209% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 88.4759854424 43.030603864 206% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 258.0 112.824112599 229% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 47.0 22.9334400587 205% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 10.0 5.23603664747 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181724248862 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131208816904 0.103423049105 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.146553717619 0.0843802449381 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131208816904 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.146553717619 0.0819641961636 179% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 27.9 13.2329268293 211% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 6.85 61.2550243902 11% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 15.9 6.51609756098 244% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 24.0 10.3012195122 233% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 15.45 11.4140731707 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 11.4329268293 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 20.8 10.9970731707 189% => OK
text_standard: 21.0 11.0658536585 190% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.