The chart bellow shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989.
The diagram presents data about fluctuation in average price of house in major five cities of world from 1990 to 2002 in comparison to average changing price of 1989.
Overall, it can be observed that New York, Tokyo, and London real estate price was declined in between 1990 to 1995. On the other hand Madrid and Frankfurt house price increased. However, from 1996 to 2002 on an average price was increased except London.
The price of house in New York city was declined by 5 percent in first five year from 1990 to 1995 and start to increase by 5 percentage in a second five years i.e. 1996 to 2002 in comparison to average change in price of house in 1989. Madrid city house price was in increasing trend at a slow rate. Similarly, the average price of house in Tokyo was rapidly decreasing in first five year and start to increased at slow rate in second five year of observation. However, Frankfurt city's real estate price has been increasing at a slow rate in comparison to 1989. On the other hand, price changing rate of house in London is very fluctuating where in a first five year it was decreasing in a high rate but in the second phase of observation it grow at a high rate almost 12 percentage in 2002 with compared of change in price of house in 1989.
- The table illustrates the nature of national consumer expenditure in Ireland, Italy, Spain, Sweden and Turkey on three categories of consumer product in 2002. 61
- he chart bellow shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989. 67
- The given trend line explains consumption of fish and different kind of meet items in a Europian country from 1979 to 2004. 73
- Task 1General training test 11
- The table illustrates the nature of national consumer expenditure in Ireland, Italy, Spain, Sweden and Turkey on three categories of consumer product in 2002. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 195, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...years i.e. 1996 to 2002 in comparison to average change in price of house in 1989...
^^
Line 3, column 745, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'grows'?
Suggestion: grows
...t in the second phase of observation it grow at a high rate almost 12 percentage in ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, second, similarly, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 33.7804878049 175% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1036.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.44635193133 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41870531205 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.407725321888 0.547539520022 74% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 324.0 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.3151492606 43.030603864 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.111111111 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8888888889 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.461108275771 0.215688989381 214% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.235886811494 0.103423049105 228% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125501587198 0.0843802449381 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.375644232599 0.15604864568 241% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108975711741 0.0819641961636 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.83 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.05 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.