The column chart delineates the proportion of time that parents spent with their offspring engaging in various activities in the year 2013.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is obvious that the majority of children doing their homework and dressing were with their moms, meanwhile, kids enjoyed their recreation with their dads more than with their moms.
As is presented in the chart, we can see that the amount of time that female parents who engage with their kids in making clothes and schoolwork was more frequent than dads, at 70% and 60%, and were threefold and doubled compared to dads, respectively. When it comes to dads, the majority of the time dads joining with their children was in entertainment, like playing video games and getting ready for bedtime, at 70% and 50% in turn. Whereas the time dads spending on playing games was below three-fold in comparison with the records for moms, the time that they participate in preparing for bed was nearly equal.
On the other hand, the percentage of time parents spent together on assisting their children was almost below 10%, apart from the first position, belonging to their assignments, at 10%. Lastly, the rest activities that both parents joined with their children were in the minority, approximately 5% or below at each.
- The diagram below shows the recycling process of plastics Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emission which result from this energy use Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compar
- The map shows the changes to a residence hall between 2010 and the present 73
- The diagram below shows the process by which bricks are manufactured for the building industry Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The bar chart below describes some changes about the percentage of people were born in Australia and who were born outside Australia living in urban rural and town between 1995 and 2010 Summarise the informat 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, lastly, look, so, whereas, while, apart from, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 21.0 5.60731707317 375% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1085.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02314814815 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56486077643 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537037037037 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.6402187024 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.0 112.824112599 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.8571428571 22.9334400587 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 5.23603664747 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.34218640201 0.215688989381 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.175315872807 0.103423049105 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624406745596 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2306707848 0.15604864568 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.051163871087 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.2329268293 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.43 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.